A Critical Review of the Risks to Water Resources from Unconventional Shale Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States

Abstract

The rapid rise of shale gas development through horizontal drilling and high volume hydraulic fracturing has expanded the extraction of hydrocarbon resources in the U.S. The rise of shale gas development has triggered an intense public debate regarding the potential environmental and human health effects from hydraulic fracturing. This paper provides a critical review of the potential risks that shale gas operations pose to water resources, with an emphasis on case studies mostly from the U.S. Four potential risks for water resources are identified: (1) the contamination of shallow aquifers with fugitive hydrocarbon gases (i.e., stray gas contamination), which can also potentially lead to the salinization of shallow groundwater through leaking natural gas wells and subsurface flow; (2) the contamination of surface water and shallow groundwater from spills, leaks, and/or the disposal of inadequately treated shale gas wastewater; (3) the accumulation of toxic and radioactive elements in soil or stream sediments near disposal or spill sites; and (4) the overextraction of water resources for high-volume hydraulic fracturing that could induce water shortages or conflicts with other water users, particularly in water-scarce areas. Analysis of published data (through January 2014) reveals evidence for stray gas contamination, surface water impacts in areas of intensive shale gas development, and the accumulation of radium isotopes in some disposal and spill sites. The direct contamination of shallow groundwater from hydraulic fracturing fluids and deep formation waters by hydraulic fracturing itself, however, remains controversial.

Sustainability lessons from shale development in the United States for Mexico and other emerging unconventional oil and gas developers

“…On the other hand, surface contamination is generally caused by spills, leaks, and accidental releases. Vidic et al [55] and Vengosh et al [56] found little evidence of shallow-water chemical contamination; strong evidence of methane contamination; some evidence of deepwater-shallow-water aquifer mixing; and significant issues regarding produced water management and accidental spills [31].…”

Extreme energy, ‘fracking’ and human rights: a new field for human rights impact assessments?

“…103 For instance, radium has been found to be building up in rivers downstream of shale gas waste discharge points in Pennsylvania, 104 while a company has been fined for contaminating an aquifer with CBM (termed coal seam gas (CSG) in Australia) waste containing uranium in New South Wales, Australia. 105 Summarising much of the data, a recent landmark US study by Vengosh et al argues that the overall risks posed by fracking development for water are fourfold (a similar, though subtly different list could be produced for CBM 106 extraction) 107 :…”

Current perspectives on unconventional shale gas extraction in the Appalachian Basin

“…They may pose a threat to surface and near surface groundwater as the liners can leak. [78,79] Improper construction or site restoration can result in erosion and sedimentation and an increase in the suspended solid load in streams. [80] Impoundments holding recycling fluids can be a source of VOCs as they are often aerated to keep the growth of bacteria and the resulting sepsis to a minimum.…”