Clinical audit of multidisciplinary care at a medium-sized hospital in Spain

Abstract

BackgroundMultidisciplinary care is a key enabler in the provision of high quality care for cancer patients. Despite compelling evidence supporting their benefit to patients and for providers, multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC) are not universally occurring. Team composition of MCC reflects the multidisciplinary nature of the body. Lack of nursing input can have a negative impact on team decision making. The objective of this study was to evaluate multidisciplinary care and adherence to national recommendations at a medium-sized hospital through a clinical audit of cancer conferences and clinical records.MethodsA total of 77 multidisciplinary cancer conferences were visited and 496 electronic health records were reviewed. The regularity of meetings and multidisciplinary attendance were evaluated. Each electronic health record was checked to verify documented prospective discussion before any treatment was started.ResultsNine multidisciplinary teams meet on a weekly or biweekly basis at the hospital with an average number of ten people and six different specialties represented. Average duration of meetings was 46.8 min. Though most patients (64.5%) were discussed at some point at the relevant cancer conference, only 40% had a documented multidisciplinary team discussion prior to the first treatment. Pathological stage (pTNM) was documented in 53.6% of clinical records.ConclusionsNursing representatives should be included as usual attendees at cancer conferences. Prospective discussion of all cancer cases should be encouraged. Use of checklists and systematic collection of key information, specifically cancer staging, could improve clinical documentation in the electronic clinical record.

Management of veno‐occlusive disease: the multidisciplinary approach to care

“…It is pivotal to recognise complications early and manage those appropriately without delay, in an attempt to avoid the onset of late signs, such as bleeding, abnormal liver function tests, pulmonary failure or MOF; everyone is responsible, and the multidisciplinary approach to care has been identified as a key enabler in the provision of high‐quality treatment and care in oncology . It is generally considered that the peak incidence of VOD occurs around Day 12 (post‐transplant).…”

Audit of the quality of medical care as a way to improve the efficiency of medical organizations

“…Описан опыт успешного применения аудитов с целью анализа соблюдения критериев лечения кожных болез-ней у детей, обострений хронической обструктивной болезни легких, назначения аппендэктомии, соблюде-ния необходимых норм выполнения стоматологических процедур, надлежащего контроля за уровнем артериаль-ного давления [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”

Economic Soundness and Interdisciplinary Teamwork in the UK

“…The effect of multidisciplinary teams and resource allocation contribute or detract from a healthcare organization and ultimately countries’ economic soundness. In evaluating multidisciplinary healthcare teams (MDT) two issues are here considered, first is the quality of the service to persons and second is economic impact (Ruiz-Casado, Ortega, Soria, & Cebolla, 2014; NHS National Cancer Action Team, 2010).…”