2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between obstetrical interventions and late preterm birth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the change of institution due to medical indication, particularly to tertiary medical institutions, might be associated with shortened gestational duration and preterm birth. In addition, our results were consistent with previous reports describing the association between cesarean section and preterm birth . Our sensitivity analysis using a multiple linear regression model excluding cesarean section cases showed similar results as found in our main analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the change of institution due to medical indication, particularly to tertiary medical institutions, might be associated with shortened gestational duration and preterm birth. In addition, our results were consistent with previous reports describing the association between cesarean section and preterm birth . Our sensitivity analysis using a multiple linear regression model excluding cesarean section cases showed similar results as found in our main analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, our results were consistent with previous reports describing the association between cesarean section and preterm birth. [12][13][14] Our sensitivity analysis using a multiple linear regression model excluding cesarean section cases showed similar results as found in our main analysis. Therefore, because there were no significant associations between institution change due to self-referral and gestational duration or preterm birth in the main and sensitivity analyses, it might be difficult to consider institution change due to self-referral as a risk factor for shortened gestational duration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Estimated risk ranged from 1.2 to 31.7 with incidence ranging from 5.8 to 80.1%, but the majority of studies reported between 40 and 60%. 1,2,8,15,17,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Approximately 50 to 80% of preterm births in the setting of abruption are spontaneous (preterm labor or membrane rupture), but abruption is also considered the fourth most common cause of medically indicated preterm birth. 50,64 Spontaneous preterm birth due to abruption is thought to be the result of bleeding from the separation of the placental which irritates the uterine lining and stimulates contractions which progress into preterm labor.…”
Section: Preterm Birth and Fetal Or Neonatal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provider behavior could have also influenced the prevalence of preterm birth in ways that cannot be analyzed. For example, because survival for preterm babies has improved significantly, providers might feel more comfortable with aggressive treatment options for complicated pregnancies, although new evidence is mixed regarding this theory [17,19,21,22]. Nevertheless, if this behavior change occurred in the study population, it was not reflected in improved neonatal health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%