Abstract:Rates of ESRD attributed to LiN are increasing rapidly. Currently accepted lithium dosages and duration of treatment might induce ESRD in a large cohort of patients. We encourage clinicians to exercise discretion when prescribing lithium, check renal function regularly, stop lithium if there is a deterioration in two consecutive readings, and consider substitution with other drugs.
“…Currently this analysis suggests that even short-term exposure to elevated lithium levels has a significant impact on glomerular renal function in the first 3 months following exposure, and regular monitoring of lithium levels and timely responses to these levels is critical. 19 It is still not known whether the kidneys can fully recover this lost function or if the effects of multiple exposures are additive; as such we suggest that lithium level monitoring should be undertaken at least every 3 months, in line with current UK guidelines, and not be reduced further until the impact of more than one exposure to these lithium levels has been fully established. A small change in GFR of 5 mL/min in an individual patient may well be due to variability in measurement of plasma creatinine, and is unlikely to lead to any action, unless it was sustained or there was further deterioration, which is another reason for regular monitoring.…”
ObjectivesLithium is a mainstay of bipolar disorder treatment, however, there are still differences in opinion on the effects of lithium use on renal function. The aim of this analysis was to determine if there is an association between short-term exposure to various elevated lithium levels and estimated-glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at ≤3 months, 6 months (±3 months) and 1 year (±3 months) follow-up.SettingNorfolk-wide (UK) lithium register and database.Participants699 patients from the Norfolk database.Primary outcome measureseGFR change from baseline at ≤3 months, 6 months (±3 months) and 1 year (±3 months) after exposure to a lithium level within these ranges: 0.81–1.0 mmol/L (group 2), 1.01–1.2 mmol/L (group 3) and 1.21–2.0 mmol/L (group 4). The reference group was patients whose lithium levels never exceeded 0.8 mmol/L.ResultsCompared to the reference group, groups 3 and 4 showed a significant decrease in eGFR in the first 3 months after exposure (p=0.047 and p=0.040). At 6 months (±3 months) postexposure group 4 still showed a decline in eGFR, however, this result was not significant (p=0.298).ConclusionsThese results show for the first time that a single incident of a lithium level >1.0 mmol/L is associated with a significant decrease in eGFR in the following 3 months when compared to patients whose lithium levels never exceeded 0.8 mmol/L. It is still not known whether the kidneys can recover this lost function and the impact that more than a single exposure to a level within these ranges can have on renal function. These results suggest that lithium level monitoring should be undertaken at least every 3 months, in line with current UK guidelines and not be reduced further until the impact of more than one exposure to these lithium levels has been fully established.
“…Currently this analysis suggests that even short-term exposure to elevated lithium levels has a significant impact on glomerular renal function in the first 3 months following exposure, and regular monitoring of lithium levels and timely responses to these levels is critical. 19 It is still not known whether the kidneys can fully recover this lost function or if the effects of multiple exposures are additive; as such we suggest that lithium level monitoring should be undertaken at least every 3 months, in line with current UK guidelines, and not be reduced further until the impact of more than one exposure to these lithium levels has been fully established. A small change in GFR of 5 mL/min in an individual patient may well be due to variability in measurement of plasma creatinine, and is unlikely to lead to any action, unless it was sustained or there was further deterioration, which is another reason for regular monitoring.…”
ObjectivesLithium is a mainstay of bipolar disorder treatment, however, there are still differences in opinion on the effects of lithium use on renal function. The aim of this analysis was to determine if there is an association between short-term exposure to various elevated lithium levels and estimated-glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at ≤3 months, 6 months (±3 months) and 1 year (±3 months) follow-up.SettingNorfolk-wide (UK) lithium register and database.Participants699 patients from the Norfolk database.Primary outcome measureseGFR change from baseline at ≤3 months, 6 months (±3 months) and 1 year (±3 months) after exposure to a lithium level within these ranges: 0.81–1.0 mmol/L (group 2), 1.01–1.2 mmol/L (group 3) and 1.21–2.0 mmol/L (group 4). The reference group was patients whose lithium levels never exceeded 0.8 mmol/L.ResultsCompared to the reference group, groups 3 and 4 showed a significant decrease in eGFR in the first 3 months after exposure (p=0.047 and p=0.040). At 6 months (±3 months) postexposure group 4 still showed a decline in eGFR, however, this result was not significant (p=0.298).ConclusionsThese results show for the first time that a single incident of a lithium level >1.0 mmol/L is associated with a significant decrease in eGFR in the following 3 months when compared to patients whose lithium levels never exceeded 0.8 mmol/L. It is still not known whether the kidneys can recover this lost function and the impact that more than a single exposure to a level within these ranges can have on renal function. These results suggest that lithium level monitoring should be undertaken at least every 3 months, in line with current UK guidelines and not be reduced further until the impact of more than one exposure to these lithium levels has been fully established.
“…The incidence of lithium associated CRD and ESRD was previously unclear, but new epidemiological data and metaanalyses provide useful information [97,102]. The previously mentioned Swedish study looked for lithium-induced ESRD in a population of 2.7 million and found a sixfold increase in the rate of renal replacement therapy in those treated with lithium; however, the absolute risk was small (18 of 3369 or 0.5%) [98].…”
Section: Renal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The improved understanding of lithium-induced renal effects highlights the importance of regular renal monitoring for anyone taking lithium [97,98,100] and particularly for those who have taken it for many years [97]. Prescribers should strive to use the lowest effective lithium dose, since the optimal dosing regimen to prevent renal disease remains unclear [103].…”
Section: Renal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although lithium's renal effects have previously been debated [97], it is now well established that chronic and endstage renal disease (ESRD) are uncommon outcomes of longterm lithium therapy [98][99][100][101]. The nephropathy is typically asymptomatic and usually develops 10-20 years after the medication is initiated, but occasionally occurs earlier [101].…”
Lithium is a commonly prescribed treatment for bipolar disorder. Many early studies on which its use has been historically based no longer meet current research standards. A large number of studies with more modern designs have been recently published warranting a review. New research adds to the evidence for lithium's efficacy in mania and maintenance. There is also additional evidence, albeit less robust, to support its benefit in bipolar depression and mixed episodes. Meta-analyses of mainly observational data have found reduced suicidal behavior in bipolar patients taking lithium. Careful monitoring and prescribing can reduce the risk of adverse effects.
“…To the Editor : The article by Roxanas and colleagues 1 is a welcome addition to the body of literature that clearly demonstrates a causal relationship between lithium use and chronic renal failure. The recommendation to monitor renal function 6‐monthly and be hypervigilant to deteriorating renal function is sound clinical advice.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.