Abstract:A heterogeneous set of factors highlights the complexity of prescribing ICTS for early RA in daily clinical practice. Future improvement strategies should stimulate the facilitators while at the same time addressing the barriers. The generalizability of these findings to other health care systems needs further examination.
“…The barriers about side effects, perceived patient's resistance and non-compliance with the treatment are similar to those of rheumatologists prescribing an intensive treatment strategy (21). Our findings show that GPs want to be involved, without taking over the rheumatologist's tasks or entering their specialty.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We developed an interview guide (Box 1) that was based on (a) literature on GPs' experiences to early RA management and (b) previous interviews with rheumatologists, nurses and patients regarding intensive treatment strategies for early RA in Flanders (15,17,21,22). Two authors (JS and SM) conducted the interviews.…”
“…The barriers about side effects, perceived patient's resistance and non-compliance with the treatment are similar to those of rheumatologists prescribing an intensive treatment strategy (21). Our findings show that GPs want to be involved, without taking over the rheumatologist's tasks or entering their specialty.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We developed an interview guide (Box 1) that was based on (a) literature on GPs' experiences to early RA management and (b) previous interviews with rheumatologists, nurses and patients regarding intensive treatment strategies for early RA in Flanders (15,17,21,22). Two authors (JS and SM) conducted the interviews.…”
“…Furthermore, the possibility to use a lower dose of GCs, while having the same efficacy, could benefit the implementation of COBRA-like strategies. Rheumatologists appear more reluctant to administer complex therapies with high dosages of GCs,22 23 40–42 although we showed that this approach is feasible in daily practice 35. den Uyl et al 36 reported similar results comparing an attenuated COBRA regimen with the original one in a moderately active eRA population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The perception on GCs, however, remains ambiguous in both the patient's and the physician's mind. Thus many rheumatologists hesitate to prescribe GCs due to fear for side effects 22 23. Little is yet known about the optimal initial dose, treatment duration and administration route 24…”
ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of intensive combination strategies with glucocorticoids (GCs) in the first 16 weeks (W) of early rheumatoid arthritis (eRA) treatment, focusing on high-risk patients, in the Care in early RA trial.Methods400 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD)-naive patients with eRA were recruited and stratified into high risk or low risk according to classical prognostic markers. High-risk patients (n=290) were randomised to 1/3 treatment strategies: combination therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis (COBRA) Classic (methotrexate (MTX)+ sulfasalazine+60 mg prednisone tapered to 7.5 mg daily from W7), COBRA Slim (MTX+30 mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg from W6) and COBRA Avant-Garde (MTX+leflunomide+30 mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg from W6). Treatment modifications to target low-disease activity were mandatory from W8, if desirable and feasible according to the rheumatologist. The primary outcome was remission (28 joint disease activity score calculated with C-reactive protein <2.6) at W16 (intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary endpoints were good European League Against Rheumatism response, clinically meaningful health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) response and HAQ equal to zero. Adverse events (AEs) were registered.ResultsData from 98 Classic, 98 Slim and 94 Avant-Garde patients were analysed. At W16, remission was reached in 70.4% Classic, 73.6% Slim and 68.1% Avant-Garde patients (p=0.713). Likewise, no significant differences were shown in other secondary endpoints. However, therapy-related AEs were reported in 61.2% of Classic, in 46.9% of Slim and in 69.1% of Avant-Garde patients (p=0.006).ConclusionsFor high-risk eRA, MTX associated with a moderate step-down dose of GCs was as effective in inducing remission at W16 as DMARD combination therapies with moderate or high step-down GC doses and it showed a more favourable short-term safety profile.EudraCT number:2008-007225-39.
“…[55][56][57] A heterogeneous set of factors has been identified that seem to influence prescription of intensive combination treatment for RA, including clinicians' personal faith in the treatment strategy, availability of staff support, lack of financial support, time constraints, and concerns regarding patients' perceptions. 58 Inappropriate practice change In contrast to the delays observed in utilization of other new treatments, biologic drugs enjoyed rapid uptake into clinical practice in the early 2000s after trials demonstrated that they reduce disease activity and improve quality of life in people with severe, active RA that is unresponsive to traditional DMARDs. Although these expensive drugs are acknowledged to represent a distinct advance in the treatment of RA and other inflammatory arthritides, expansion of their use to include people with earlier and less-severe disease preceded the demonstration of evidence establishing their value across these additional indications.…”
Section: Increasing the Value Of Clinical Researchmentioning
Despite a substantial contribution to the global burden of disease, musculoskeletal conditions are under-represented in clinical research, and that which is performed is often wasteful and lacking clinical relevance. Even clinically relevant musculoskeletal research might not lead to timely or adequate changes in clinical practice and associated improvements in patient outcomes. The formulation of clinical recommendations alone is usually insufficient to bring about changes in practice patterns. Research exploring how to improve the translation of evidence-based recommendations into practice, as well as the identification and removal of barriers to practice change, is necessary in order for the promise of musculoskeletal research to be realized in improved health outcomes. These goals can be achieved by improvements in the coordination of research activities, the resourcing and allocation of funding, and the involvement of clinicians and patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.