Protocol for an HTA report: Does therapeutic writing help people with long-term conditions? Systematic review, realist synthesis and economic modelling

Abstract

IntroductionLong-term medical conditions (LTCs) cause reduced health-related quality of life and considerable health service expenditure. Writing therapy has potential to improve physical and mental health in people with LTCs, but its effectiveness is not established. This project aims to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapeutic writing in LTCs by systematic review and economic evaluation, and to evaluate context and mechanisms by which it might work, through realist synthesis.MethodsIncluded are any comparative study of therapeutic writing compared with no writing, waiting list, attention control or placebo writing in patients with any diagnosed LTCs that report at least one of the following: relevant clinical outcomes; quality of life; health service use; psychological, behavioural or social functioning; adherence or adverse events. Searches will be conducted in the main medical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index. For the realist review, further purposive and iterative searches through snowballing techniques will be undertaken. Inclusions, data extraction and quality assessment will be in duplicate with disagreements resolved through discussion. Quality assessment will include using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Data synthesis will be narrative and tabular with meta-analysis where appropriate. De novo economic modelling will be attempted in one clinical area if sufficient evidence is available and performed according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) reference case.

Effectiveness of knowledge translation tools addressing multiple high-burden chronic diseases affecting older adults: protocol for a systematic review alongside a realist review

“…There may also be a benefit to conducting a realist review alongside a systematic review to simplify and streamline their conduct compared with conducting them individually. There is currently no published example of this, but there is at least one investigation underway, 42 so our investigation will also contribute to advancing knowledge of this method.…”

Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis

“…52 The realist review methodology is particularly useful for understanding and illuminating the relationships and impact of the interaction between the components of a complex intervention. 53,54 Realist reviews ask 'what works, for whom, in what circumstances, to what extent, how and why?' and consider the interaction between context, mechanism and outcome [how particular contexts (e.g.…”

“…Outlining the realist approach 55 The realist review methodology is particularly useful for understanding and illuminating the relationships between component parts and the impact of the interaction between component parts in a complex intervention. 53,54 It generates explanations about the mechanisms by which stopping medication may (or may not) achieve an impact in different settings and within different subgroups. (Some people with multimorbidity and problematic polypharmacy may respond well to stopping medication, whereas others might respond better to a different approach, or not at all.…”