2014
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Household Smoking Bans on Household Smoking

Abstract: Absent in-home randomized experiments, a quasi-experimental causal inference suggesting that home smoking rules result in lower home smoking levels may be plausible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variable was based on the restriction of smoking in areas agreed by the house members to prevent children or non-smokers of the family being exposed to secondhand smoke. This measure has become more popular in the UK during the past 20 years 26 because there are research results that show that such a rule or agreement mitigated the odds of secondhand smoke exposure 18,27 and helped smokers to reduce their amount of cigarettes per day and finally to quit 32 . Besides, the smoking-free rule also minimized the chance of smoking among the youths who were house members, or at least it helped to extend or prolong their smoking trial period 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This variable was based on the restriction of smoking in areas agreed by the house members to prevent children or non-smokers of the family being exposed to secondhand smoke. This measure has become more popular in the UK during the past 20 years 26 because there are research results that show that such a rule or agreement mitigated the odds of secondhand smoke exposure 18,27 and helped smokers to reduce their amount of cigarettes per day and finally to quit 32 . Besides, the smoking-free rule also minimized the chance of smoking among the youths who were house members, or at least it helped to extend or prolong their smoking trial period 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, possible recall bias may have resulted in under-reporting, such as receiving less or light smoke, no strong smell or good scent, or getting used to the smoke smell. Further study is needed using more specific SHS markers to provide a better understanding of SHS exposure at home, such as cotinine levels in non-smoking students 32 . Future studies should have a larger sample and number of strata, and the design effect should be applied to address the issue of the cluster effect of respondents from the same classroom.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the likelihood of success, health communication interventions tend to rely on behavior change theories in order to identify people’s main motivations to engage in recommended health practices. Several behavioral theories are available [ 1 – 7 ] and reviews stress the argument that program practitioners should rely on these theories to design successful preventive or lifestyle interventions [ 5 , 8 , 9 ]. Central to behavior change theories is the claim that health interventions impact behavior through a mechanism of influence: health messages—or any informational intervention for that matter—first, influence peoples’ beliefs, and, subsequently, these beliefs influence attitudes, self-efficacy or intentions, which in turn influence behavior [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study applied one major behavior change theory, namely the Reasoned Action Approach [ 4 , 6 , 7 ], first, to identify salient beliefs about walking three times a week for 30 minutes nonstop among patients with hypertension and, second, to measure the relationships among intentions, attitudes, perceived social pressure and perceived behavioral control about this behavior in this population. Overall, as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, which are responsible for almost half the deaths resulting from chronic diseases in Latin America and the Caribbean [ 10 ], hypertension constitutes a problem relevant to public health interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In households with smokers, our results show that households with more than one smoker were at greater risk of parents who disagreed with the PRPCETS question. Home is a one place that THS occurs because people have previously smoked inside [18][19][20] . Our hypothesis is that in households that have many smokers and have children, there is a chance that a smoker smoked in their home or close to home such as by a wall or door.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%