2014
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell enabled comparative genomics of a deep ocean SAR11 bathytype

Abstract: Bacterioplankton of the SAR11 clade are the most abundant microorganisms in marine systems, usually representing 25% or more of the total bacterial cells in seawater worldwide. SAR11 is divided into subclades with distinct spatiotemporal distributions (ecotypes), some of which appear to be specific to deep water. Here we examine the genomic basis for deep ocean distribution of one SAR11 bathytype (depth-specific ecotype), subclade Ic. Four single-cell Ic genomes, with estimated completeness of 55%-86%, were is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(109 reference statements)
8
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Complementary to a "bulk" screening of marine biodiversity, single-cell genomics approaches allow matching of phenotype and genotype, and have been used to investigate the phylogenetic affinities of microbial dark matter (i.e., currently unculturable microbial organisms; Rinke et al, 2013;Hug et al, 2016) and to uncover niche partitioning within globally distributed lineages of marine microbes (Kashtan et al, 2014). In combination, bulk and targeted approaches could unravel the taxonomic composition of planktonic organisms, as well as aspects of their ecological function (Thrash et al, 2014;Louca et al, 2016) and genome evolution to new environments (Mock et al, 2017).…”
Section: The New Wealth Of Plankton Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary to a "bulk" screening of marine biodiversity, single-cell genomics approaches allow matching of phenotype and genotype, and have been used to investigate the phylogenetic affinities of microbial dark matter (i.e., currently unculturable microbial organisms; Rinke et al, 2013;Hug et al, 2016) and to uncover niche partitioning within globally distributed lineages of marine microbes (Kashtan et al, 2014). In combination, bulk and targeted approaches could unravel the taxonomic composition of planktonic organisms, as well as aspects of their ecological function (Thrash et al, 2014;Louca et al, 2016) and genome evolution to new environments (Mock et al, 2017).…”
Section: The New Wealth Of Plankton Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Host assignment within different SAR11 subclades was not possible (except for group D [see below]) due to (i) lack of tRNA genes (only 18 genomes had them, and the ones present were all under 95% identity to SAR11 known tRNAs), which suggests that either we do not have genome representatives for the hosts they infect, or they have a broad host range, (ii) similarity of shared proteins provided inconclusive results (same identity to distantly related host-groups) and (iii) there is only one report of a CRISPR-cas system in SAR11, which is found only in the bathypelagic ecotype Ic (34). The enormous diversity of the SAR11 clade probably complicates the process of host assignment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Together, these findings increased sixfold the SAR11 myophage repertoire and allowed us to discover different PMP clades, including the first myophage specific of the freshwater genus Ca. Fonsibacter and the bathypelagic SAR11 phylogroup Ic (9,34). This recovery effort has increased their genome diversity enough to be able to perform genomic comparisons with the closest well-studied CMPs to elucidate peculiarities of the PMP infection model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Indeed, fragment recruitment of meta genomic reads to full genome sequences has been repeatedly used to identify hypervariable regions or metagenomic islands hinting at a high level of microdiversification within closely related strains in the environment (Rodriguez-Valera et al 2009, Cordero & Polz 2014, Thrash et al 2014. Genome sequences can also be retrieved from metatranscriptomes and -proteomes (Fig.…”
Section: Reference For Meta-omics and Detection Of Different Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%