2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…nisch unterstützter Versorgungssetting getestet [16][17][18][19]. Adoptions-und Akzeptanzmoderierende Faktoren stellen dabei Geschlecht [20][21][22], Alter [23][24][25][26] und kultureller Hintergrund [27] dar.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…nisch unterstützter Versorgungssetting getestet [16][17][18][19]. Adoptions-und Akzeptanzmoderierende Faktoren stellen dabei Geschlecht [20][21][22], Alter [23][24][25][26] und kultureller Hintergrund [27] dar.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A shared health summary (SHS), a fixed in time document, was to be created by the GP during patient consultation, with summary details to assist in treatment by other providers. Medicare was also another source of information providing access to Medicare claims data [8,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Myhr System Design and Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted prior to the launch of the PCEHR established that the public as well as healthcare providers were uninformed about the impeding introduction of the PCEHR . Survey data collected from 405 Australian consumers ( n = 203) and healthcare providers ( n = 202) in November 2010 indicate that respondents believe that healthcare providers with access to the PCEHR would be able to provide better quality of care; therefore, it would be beneficial to have a PCEHR.…”
Section: Component Loadings Of the 17 Pcehr Attitude Items In The Primentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted prior to the launch of the PCEHR established that the public as well as healthcare providers were uninformed about the impeding introduction of the PCEHR. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Survey data collected from 405 Australian consumers (n = 203) and healthcare providers (n = 202) in November 2010 indicate that respondents believe that healthcare providers with access to the PCEHR would be able to provide better quality of care; therefore, it would be beneficial to have a PCEHR. However, respondents also believed it was important for individuals to remain in control over what information was uploaded to the PCEHR and who could access the PCEHR thereby potentially limiting healthcare providers' access to crucial information needed to provide better quality of care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%