Teamwork Assessment in Internal Medicine: A Systematic Review of Validity Evidence and Outcomes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Valid teamwork assessment is imperative to determine physician competency and optimize patient outcomes. We systematically reviewed published instruments assessing teamwork in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education in general internal medicine and all medical subspecialties. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-process, CINAHL and PsycINFO from January 1979 through October 2012, references of included articles, and abstracts from four professional meetings. Two content experts were queried for additional studies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY: Included studies described quantitative tools measuring teamwork among medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing physicians on single or multi-professional (interprofessional) teams. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS:Instrument validity and study quality were extracted using established frameworks with existing validity evidence. Two authors independently abstracted 30 % of articles and agreement was calculated. RESULTS: Of 12,922 citations, 178 articles describing 73 unique teamwork assessment tools met inclusion criteria. Interrater agreement was intraclass correlation coefficient 0.73 (95 % CI 0.63-0.81). Studies involved practicing physicians (142, 80 %), residents/fellows (70, 39 %), and medical students (11, 6 %). The majority (152, 85 %) assessed interprofessional teams. Studies were conducted in inpatient (77, 43 %), outpatient (42, 24 %), simulation (37, 21 %), and classroom (13, 7 %) settings. Validity evidence for the 73 tools included content (54, 74 %), internal structure (51, 70 %), relationships to other variables (25, 34 %), and response process (12, 16 %). Attitudes and opinions were the most frequently assessed outcomes. Relationships between teamwork scores and patient outcomes were directly examined for 13 (18 %) of tools. Scores from the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and Team Climate Inventory have substantial validity evidence and have been associated with improved patient outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Review is limited to quantitative assessments of teamwork in internal medicine. CONCLUSIONS:There is strong validity evidence for several published tools assessing teamwork in internal medicine. However, few teamwork assessments have been directly linked to patient outcomes. 3,4 Recognizing this, the Institute of Medicine, the Joint Commission, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and others have made teamwork a top priority in their recommendations for improving healthcare. [5][6][7][8][9] Teamwork is also prominently positioned within the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) requirements for maintenance of certification for internists, 10 as well as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's core competencies, 11 milestones, 12 and medical student competencies. 13 As such, every physician at the undergraduate, graduate, and continuing professional level must demonstrate competency in teamwork.While there is broad agreement on the imperative to improve teamwork, there is littl...

Charting a Key Competency Domain: Understanding Resident Physician Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC) Skills

“…Direct workplace observation of a resident giving feedback to an interprofessional colleague may not be feasible and simply placing learners in team-based care may be insufficient to teach these skills. 23,24 Performance-based assessment such as OSCEs may be an ideal, efficient strategy for providing program needs assessments and educational opportunities in these critical but difficult to directly observe milestones.…”

Follow-up to Abnormal Cancer Screening Tests: Considering the Multilevel Context of Care

“…If clinicians are made aware of community resources to offer, how many patients report they actually discussed and were encouraged to use the resources (67)? End points at the provider level might include acceptance of the navigator, metrics of team functioning, and enthusiasm for the intervention (68). Related considerations include whether multilevel interventions deliver better outcomes than single level interventions, and whether understanding the multilevel effects will speed adoption (69, 70).…”

Management commitment to safety, teamwork, and hospital worker injuries

“…[6] In addition, teamwork is generally considered important in protecting worker safety. [2,7] However, although many studies link teamwork in health care settings to patient safety, [8] evidence linking teamwork to hospital worker safety is lacking. This study addresses this gap by providing evidence linking teamwork perceptions in hospital workers to organizational records of worker injuries, and further, proposes and tests a conceptual model wherein manager commitment to safety facilitates teamwork, which in turn, relates to worker injuries on the job.…”

“…[8] Teamwork is typically conceptualized as part of “patient safety culture” [14] and is included in many measures of leading indicators of patient safety. [15–18] …”