2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00391-013-0559-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fall detection with body-worn sensors

Abstract: Limited methodological agreement between sensor-based fall detection studies using body-worn sensors was identified. Published evidence-based support for commercially available fall detection devices is still lacking. A worldwide research group consensus is needed to address fundamental issues such as incident verification, the establishment of guidelines for fall reporting and the development of a common fall definition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
83
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results somehow match the divergence results among previous studies [23], which suggest that the raw signals from accelerometers may not be applied directly. An algorithm for post-data processing should be developed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results somehow match the divergence results among previous studies [23], which suggest that the raw signals from accelerometers may not be applied directly. An algorithm for post-data processing should be developed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is essential to determine fall characteristics and how they differ from that of normal activities. The current state of such studies is well documented by Schwickert's recent review article, which examined 96 selected studies from numinous electronic databases [23]. Published evidence-based support for commercially available fall detection devices is still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most previous studies the sampling frequency is higher than 50 Hz [8]. Again this can depend on the algorithm, since the NN and SVM algorithms that we have presented use the raw acceleration values without performing any kind of filtering operations, in contrast with many previous works [13,32].…”
Section: -Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ludwig et al's subcategories (A.2-A.5) all entail the automated detection of some such adverse situations, like a fall, a cardiac event, or some other dangerous situation (such as a dementia sufferer wandering away from home). The scientific literature contains many reported algorithms which aim to automate the detection of falls in the home, primarily using accelerometry-based wearable sensors; see Shany et al [1] and Schwickert et al [6] for a review on fall detection algorithms. However, due to the relative rarity of fall events (approximately one in three people over 65 years will fall each year) there have been very few reports of the testing of these algorithms on data from real-world fall events; Bagalà et al provide one of the very few reports of algorithmic performance on real-world falls, although these fallers were suffering a form of Parkinson's disease, hence it is unclear how generalizable these results are [7].…”
Section: Applications In Reactivementioning
confidence: 99%