2013
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3374-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast-Conserving Surgery With or Without Radiotherapy in Older Breast Patients With Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Although patients who received radiotherapy had a lower relative risk of locoregional recurrence, the absolute risk was low, and overall survival was not affected. We propose that the debate should not only focus on the relative risk but also on the absolute benefit of radiotherapy and the number needed to treat. Both treatment options may be reasonable in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for elderly patients there is no impact of postoperative radiotherapy on breast cancerrelated survival. There are more severe cardiovascular events after radiotherapy of the breast [56,[85][86][87][88][89].…”
Section: Adjuvant Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for elderly patients there is no impact of postoperative radiotherapy on breast cancerrelated survival. There are more severe cardiovascular events after radiotherapy of the breast [56,[85][86][87][88][89].…”
Section: Adjuvant Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, several studies have documented the omission of certain treatments. A small number of clinical trials omitting radiotherapy for selected groups of older, HR positive patients, have been performed [28] none of them showing a deterred survival. However, the risk of locoregional recurrence was higher, as was also shown in the EBCTCG overview [29], and recently confirmed in the PRIME II trial [30].…”
Section: Qi 9amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The number needed to treat to prevent one death at 18 years of follow-up was 8, lower among men under the age of 65, comparing favorably to the breast cancer literature. 5 Second, in addition to overall survival, RP improves cancer-specific survival among men with localized prostate cancer. The initial publication of the SPCG-4 revealed an absolute difference in prostate cancer specific mortality of 2% at 5 years and 6.6% at 8 years in favor of prostatectomy.…”
Section: Radical Prostatectomymentioning
confidence: 99%