2013
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Procalcitonin Level, Viral Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis, and Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, PCT had been suggested to be a helpful biomarker for early diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients [12], lower respiratory tract infection [13], and community-acquired pneumonia [14]. Similarly, in our study, we found that serum PCT levels might be useful as an independent diagnostic marker for AIS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In previous studies, PCT had been suggested to be a helpful biomarker for early diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients [12], lower respiratory tract infection [13], and community-acquired pneumonia [14]. Similarly, in our study, we found that serum PCT levels might be useful as an independent diagnostic marker for AIS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, these markers are sensitive to inter-patient variability, including time from symptom onset, clinical syndrome, and pathogen species [22][23][24][25][26][27]. For example, multiple studies found that procalcitonin is valuable for guiding antimicrobial therapy duration and for predicting disease severity [28][29][30], however its diagnostic accuracy for detecting bacterial etiology in cases such as sepsis and pneumonia has been challenged [23,[31][32][33][34]. Elevated CRP levels are suggestive of a bacterial infection [35], but similar levels may be observed in patients with some viral strains (e.g., adenovirus and influenza) [36], and inflammatory diseases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The etiology of the remaining 48% is unknown. The infections could be caused by a virus outside the scope of the multiplex assay used, or it could be bacterial or other (12). Regardless of the pathogen causing the ARI, participants did not produce clinically important levels of PCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%