1940
DOI: 10.1039/jr9400001284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

242. Union of aryl nuclei. Part V. A modification of the Gomberg reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sodium acetate (900 g.) was added, and the mixture stirred for 20 hours, during which time the temperature rose to 27' (cf. Elks, Haworth & Hey, 1940). After removal of excess toluene from the toluene layer, the residual oil was distilled under reduced pressure and the fraction boiling at 170-220'/15 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium acetate (900 g.) was added, and the mixture stirred for 20 hours, during which time the temperature rose to 27' (cf. Elks, Haworth & Hey, 1940). After removal of excess toluene from the toluene layer, the residual oil was distilled under reduced pressure and the fraction boiling at 170-220'/15 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this modified Gomberg-Bachmann-Hey reaction [3][4][5][6] diazo compound 2 is assumed to undergo thermal dissociation to yield the 4-nitrophenyl free radical (4) [7] which attacks a CH carbon atom, e.g. C3 of 1, directly to give a resonance-stabilized free radical 5 [8], from which an adventitious free radical (usually acetoxy, as shown) abstracts a hydrogen atom to give 3b (See Scheme 1).…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References: ^omberg (1900); 2 Hodgson and Marsden (1940); 3 Grieve and Hey (1934); 4 Elks and Hey (1943); 5 Grieve and Hey (1932); 6 Case (1938); 7 France, Heilbron and Hey (1938); 8 Elks, Haworth and Hey (1940); 9 Hey and Lawton (1940); 10 Hey (1934); n Butterworth, Heilbron, Hey and Wilkinson (1938); 12 Heilbron, Hey and Wilkinson (1938); 13 Gomberg and Pernert (1926); 14 Möhlau and Berger (1893b); 15 Wieland, Popper and Seefried (1922); ie Bamberger (1895); 17 Bamberger (1896); 18 Franc^ Heilbron and Hey (1939); 19 Kliegl and Huber (1920); 20 Kuhling (1895Kuhling ( , 1896; 21 Dietrich (1925); 22 Lippmann (1886); 23 Hey (1932); 24 Dunstan and Hughes (1946); 25 Harley-Mason and Mann (1940); 26 Gomberg and Bachmann (1924); 27 Hey and Walker (1948); 28 Haworth, Heilbron and Hey (1940a); 29 Haworth, Heilbron and Hey (1940b); 30 Wieland and co-workers (1930Wieland and co-workers ( , 1934...…”
Section: Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%