2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved detection of semen by use of direct acid phosphatase testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The forensic science community has historically relied on the AP reaction as the best indicator for the presence of sperm. Following a literature search, Lewis reported no scientific basis for the two‐minute AP cutoff time, and additionally, both Lewis and Redhead demonstrated that increasing this cutoff time up to 16 min may be required in certain scenarios. Hofft states that the AP test does not provide reliable information as to the presence of seminal fluid and it is very tenuously related to the number of sperm heads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forensic science community has historically relied on the AP reaction as the best indicator for the presence of sperm. Following a literature search, Lewis reported no scientific basis for the two‐minute AP cutoff time, and additionally, both Lewis and Redhead demonstrated that increasing this cutoff time up to 16 min may be required in certain scenarios. Hofft states that the AP test does not provide reliable information as to the presence of seminal fluid and it is very tenuously related to the number of sperm heads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the test is simple, cheap, and rapid there can be issues with reproducibility due to temperature variation at the scene, causing changes in evaporation of the sample [22]. The acid phosphatase (AP) test for semen has been in routine use as early as the 1940s [23], but due to its relatively high falsepositive rate [24] it is unable to be used to as a confirmatory test and has recently been sidelined in favour of immunoassay approaches [25]. A considerable advantage of chemical tests is their low pertest cost, but this is often at the expense of specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Chemical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence and concentration of AP in prepubertal girls is unknown. Analytical techniques to quantify AP (e.g., Brentamine Fast Blue reaction) should be regarded as guide and if result is negative, DNA studies (autosomal STRs and Y-STRs) must proceed [ 35 ]. Indeed, the results of the Brentamine colorimetric reaction may be difficult to interpret due to the interference of fabric colors and therefore may lead to false negative results.…”
Section: Biological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%