2013
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain microabscesses in a porcine model of Staphylococcus aureus sepsis

Abstract: BackgroundSepsis caused by Staphylococcus aureus often leads to brain microabscesses in humans. Animal models of haematogenous brain abscesses would be useful to study this condition in detail. Recently, we developed a model of S. aureus sepsis in pigs and here we report that brain microabscesses develop in pigs with such induced S. aureus sepsis.Twelve pigs were divided into three groups. Nine pigs received an intravenous inoculation of S. aureus once at time 0 h (group 1) or twice at time 0 h and 12 h (group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One could assume that any patient with bacteremia is at risk for developing microabscesses in multiple organ systems, and that this process underlies organ dysfunction in sepsis. Some common bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, do form disseminated abscesses in the case of fulminant infection, including in the brain (30). Likewise, direct dissemination of Streptococcus to the myocardium contributes to cardiac dysfunction in models of pneumonia (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could assume that any patient with bacteremia is at risk for developing microabscesses in multiple organ systems, and that this process underlies organ dysfunction in sepsis. Some common bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, do form disseminated abscesses in the case of fulminant infection, including in the brain (30). Likewise, direct dissemination of Streptococcus to the myocardium contributes to cardiac dysfunction in models of pneumonia (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%