2013
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.74.11.1421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability and in vitro transcriptional permissibility of primary ovine beta-retrovirus promoter isolates

Abstract: Objective To assess genomic sequence conservation and variation in the proviral promoter of enzootic nasal tumor virus (ENTV) and Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV) in tissue samples from 3 sheep with nasal adenocarcinoma associated with ENTV and 3 sheep with pulmonary adenocarcinoma associated with JSRV and to identify a cell culture system that supports transcriptional activity of the ENTV and JSRV viral promoters. Animals 6 adult sheep. Procedures Standard PCR procedures for detection of the ENTV and JS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 293T cell line is a model in vitro cell culture system for research of target gene promoter transcription because of its high efficiency in cell transfection (Eckstrand et al, ). Approximately 24 hr before transfection, the 293T cells were plated at a density of 40,000 cells/well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 293T cell line is a model in vitro cell culture system for research of target gene promoter transcription because of its high efficiency in cell transfection (Eckstrand et al, ). Approximately 24 hr before transfection, the 293T cells were plated at a density of 40,000 cells/well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of transcriptional activity was performed in both human colonic epithelial cell line Caco-2 and embryonic kidney cell line 293T; the latter is widely used in a transcriptional activation assay because of its high efficiency in transfection. 39 Compared to the control, the luciferase activities with treatment of HTA, DTA, DEA, PPAC, and PA in Caco-2 cells were increased by around 17-, 11-, 7-, 14-, and 3-fold, respectively., The luciferase activities with treatment of HTA, DTA, DEA, PPAC and PA in 293T cells were increased by nearly 14-, 13-, 11-, 8-, and 3fold, respectively (Figure S1). Hence, HTA-treated cells had the strongest luciferase activity in both Caco-2 and 293T cell lines.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%