2013
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201300214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical manipulation of charged microparticles in polar fluids

Abstract: In this study, we report a systematic study of the response of a charged microparticle confined in an optical trap and driven by electric fields. The particle is embedded in a polar fluid, hence, the role of ions and counterions forming a double layer around the electrodes and the particle surface itself has been taken into account. We analyze two different cases: (i) electrodes energized by a step-wise voltage (DC mode) and (ii) electrodes driven by a sinusoidal voltage (AC mode). The experimental outcomes ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless after a certain value of the frequency the response starts to decrease because the particle cannot follow the oscillating driving field due to the viscosity of medium (the viscous medium acts like a low pass filter for the particle motion). In this experiment, we chose a modulation frequency f d = 96.7 Hz which optimize the response of the trapped particle to the external field (for more details see [26]). A typical autocorrelation function for the three axis is shown in Fig.2A, it is clearly visible the high signal to noise ratio achievable and that the oscillation of the particle occurs only along the z-axis where the uniform electric field was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless after a certain value of the frequency the response starts to decrease because the particle cannot follow the oscillating driving field due to the viscosity of medium (the viscous medium acts like a low pass filter for the particle motion). In this experiment, we chose a modulation frequency f d = 96.7 Hz which optimize the response of the trapped particle to the external field (for more details see [26]). A typical autocorrelation function for the three axis is shown in Fig.2A, it is clearly visible the high signal to noise ratio achievable and that the oscillation of the particle occurs only along the z-axis where the uniform electric field was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the electric charge of a trapped bead applying the external voltage only at the parallel ITO electrodes as described in [25]. In this case, the electric field was uniform (B = 0 in Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found the modulation frequency f m = 86.7 Hz to optimize the motion amplitude condition (for more details, see ref. [25,26]). The bead's effective charge value resulted to be Q = (−1.63 ± 0.05) × 10 −16 C. At the end of the experiment, we measured again the charge and verified that its value was unchanged.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense we have to point out that, as it has been already published, the zeta potential values estimated from conventional bulk zeta potential measurements and those obtained from direct single particle measurements are equivalent. 30 In addition, for each particle and experimental condition, optical forces were systematically measured over different nanoparticles to perform statistical analysis. The uncertainty of OF measurements were calculated in each case and included as error bas in Figure 5.…”
Section: Figure 5amentioning
confidence: 99%