2013
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dose-escalating phase I of imatinib mesylate with fixed dose of metronomic cyclophosphamide in targeted olid tumours

Abstract: Background:Preclinical findings suggest that imatinib mesylate (IM) and metronomic cyclophosphamide (MC) combination provides synergistic antiangiogenic activity on both pericytes and endothelial cells.Methods:We have designed a 3+3 dose-escalating phase I trial with a fixed dose of MC (50 mg two times daily) plus IM (400 mg per day; 300 and 400 mg two times daily). Enrolled patients had IM- and sutininib-refractory advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) (n=17), chordoma (n=7) and mucosal melanoma (n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among 33 studies, nine studies were clinical trials (1012, 14, 15, 1922), with eight retrospective case series (16, 17, 2328), and 16 case reports (13, 2943). Imatinib was assessed in 18 studies with a total of 221 patients (10, 16, 17, 19, 2328, 32, 3436, 38, 39, 41, 42), erlotinib in 10 studies with 16 patients (13, 17, 22, 33, 35, 38, 40–42), cetuximab in five studies (seven patients) (13, 30, 31, 33, 41), sorafenib in four studies (65 patients) (15, 17, 21, 37), pazopanib in four studies with seven patients (16, 28, 41, 43) and sunitinib in three studies with 11 patients (14, 17, 28). Sirolimus, thalidomide, bevacizumab, gefitinib, linsitinib, and everolimus were accessed in two studies each (13, 22, 25, 2831, 33, 34, 40–42), whereas dasatinib (32 patients) (11), lapatinib (18 patients) (12), rapamycin (one patients) (34), temosirolimus (one patients) (17) and yeast-brachyury (GI-6301) vaccine (11 patients) (20) were only analyzed in one study each (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 33 studies, nine studies were clinical trials (1012, 14, 15, 1922), with eight retrospective case series (16, 17, 2328), and 16 case reports (13, 2943). Imatinib was assessed in 18 studies with a total of 221 patients (10, 16, 17, 19, 2328, 32, 3436, 38, 39, 41, 42), erlotinib in 10 studies with 16 patients (13, 17, 22, 33, 35, 38, 40–42), cetuximab in five studies (seven patients) (13, 30, 31, 33, 41), sorafenib in four studies (65 patients) (15, 17, 21, 37), pazopanib in four studies with seven patients (16, 28, 41, 43) and sunitinib in three studies with 11 patients (14, 17, 28). Sirolimus, thalidomide, bevacizumab, gefitinib, linsitinib, and everolimus were accessed in two studies each (13, 22, 25, 2831, 33, 34, 40–42), whereas dasatinib (32 patients) (11), lapatinib (18 patients) (12), rapamycin (one patients) (34), temosirolimus (one patients) (17) and yeast-brachyury (GI-6301) vaccine (11 patients) (20) were only analyzed in one study each (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metronomic drug application uses continuous low doses of drugs and has been proven effective in phase I and II clinical trials in adult and pediatric solid tumor patients [ 52 54 ]. This treatment modality has been assumed to induce tumor cell dormancy and target the tumor microenvironment by reducing the tumor vasculature and by restoring immune surveillance while having little side effects [ 55 ], however, the contribution of tumor cell senescence has not been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a very promising result, since a “flaw” of metronomic chemotherapy is the low number of patients experiencing complete responses as well as the difficulty to have a significant delay for the onset of metastatic disease in patients with advanced cancer [10-17]. The broad spectrum of solid tumors that responded to this clinical approach including two patients with metastasized anal sac carcinoma makes this combination extremely promising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%