2013
DOI: 10.5888/pcd10.130011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnering With Community Institutions to Increase Access to Healthful Foods Across Municipalities

Abstract: BackgroundLow-income and minority communities have higher rates of nutrition-related chronic diseases than do high-income and nonminority communities and often have reduced availability to healthful foods. Corner store initiatives have been proposed as a strategy to improve access to healthful foods in these communities, yet few studies evaluating these initiatives have been published.Community ContextSuburban Cook County, Illinois, encompasses 125 municipalities with a population of more than 2 million. From … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such interventions include expanding farmers markets (1), increasing fresh food inventory in small stores (2,3), financing programs to support full-service groceries in underserved communities (4), and initiating healthy vending machine programs (5)(6)(7). Most healthful food interventions focus on school and community settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such interventions include expanding farmers markets (1), increasing fresh food inventory in small stores (2,3), financing programs to support full-service groceries in underserved communities (4), and initiating healthy vending machine programs (5)(6)(7). Most healthful food interventions focus on school and community settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, the articles in this issue provide a glimpse into strategies that communities used to prevent chronic diseases and associated health disparities in the United States. This issue complements an ever-increasing body of literature that describes implementation and evaluations of CPPW strategies (Baronberg et al, 2013; Barragan et al, 2014; Beets et al, 2012; Brokenleg et al, 2014; Cavanaugh et al, 2013, 2014; Cole et al, 2013; Drach et al, 2012; Dunn et al, 2012; Huberty et al, 2013; Jaskiewicz et al, 2013; Jilcott Pitts et al, 2012; Johns et al, 2012; Jordan et al, 2012; Kern et al 2014, Lafleur et al, 2013; Larson et al, 2013; Leung et al, 2013; Mandel-Ricci et al, 2013; Pitts et al, 2013a, 2013b; Robles et al, 2013; Wilson et al, 2012; Young et al, 2013). In addition, the core principles for strengthening the science of community health described in the commentary by Goodman and colleagues (in this issue) highlight the demonstrated successes of the CPPW program.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We excluded 179 articles at the final coding stage because they ultimately did not meet our eligibility criteria when the full‐length article was coded and discussed. A total of 68 articles contained quantified measures of stakeholder engagement and met our final criteria …”
Section: Flow Of Article Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%