2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

240Pu/239Pu signatures allow refining the chronology of radionuclide fallout in South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic peak typically associated with the maximum 137 Cs bomb fallout (1964)(1965) in South-America 24 ) was logically not observed in this recent sediment sequence (Fig. 3a) in agreement with previous plutonium isotope measurements performed on this core, which demonstrated that sediment deposited well after this period 25 .…”
Section: Core Description and Chronologysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The characteristic peak typically associated with the maximum 137 Cs bomb fallout (1964)(1965) in South-America 24 ) was logically not observed in this recent sediment sequence (Fig. 3a) in agreement with previous plutonium isotope measurements performed on this core, which demonstrated that sediment deposited well after this period 25 .…”
Section: Core Description and Chronologysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the southern hemisphere, the horizon of first appearance of 137 Cs in the sediment profile dates that horizon between 1954 and 1956, the exact time being a function of the sediment mean particle size, measurement sensitivity, and the core-section thickness (Leslie and Hancock 2008 ). Due to the low levels of fallout in the southern hemisphere, and the finite time taken to transport sediment-bound 137 Cs from the catchment to its deposition site, the period of peak fallout (1965) is seldom seen in the sediment record south of the equator (Chaboche et al 2022 ). Nevertheless, we prefer to accept the dates ranging between 1954 and 1956 that had been obtained by Leslie and Hancock ( 2008 ) as well as Hancock et al ( 2011 ) since our work and those cited were carried out in Australia and on Australian sediments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plutonium isotopes reveal that the signature of artificial radioactivity in cryoconite is consistent with a mix of fallout originating from the global stratospheric reservoir and weapons-grade plutonium (Figure 6a). The reference 240 Pu/ 239 Pu ratio for global fallout is 0.18, 61 while Flade Isblink cryoconite exhibits a mean value of 0.15 with a standard deviation of 0.02. Such values point to an excess of 239 Pu, the primary fissile fuel used in nuclear and thermonuclear weapons.…”
Section: Comparison Between Cryoconite and Localmentioning
confidence: 96%