Abstract:The assessment and management of patients with instability of the shoulder joint can be challenging, due to the varying ways patients present, the array of different classification systems, the confusing terminology used and the differing potential management strategies. This review article aims to provide a clear explanation of the common concepts in shoulder instability and how they relate to the assessment and management of patients.There are sections covering the mechanisms of shoulder stability, the clini… Show more
“…Waldt et al found that 86% of patients with acute anterior instability had arthroscopically proven Bankart lesions (46). Evidence supports arthroscopic surgical intervention for Bankart lesions in patients with traumatic, unidirectional instability and Bankart lesion often requiring surgery, as there is a substantial reduction in rate of recurrence with stabiliza-tion (47). CT assessment of bone stock should be considered when the Bankart fragment involves more than 25% of the glenoid face, given the likelihood of open repair and surgical bone grafting in this cohort (48).…”
Shoulder disease is common in the athletic population and may arise as a consequence of a single traumatic episode or multiple repeated events. Associated labroligamentous injuries can result in substantial disability. Specific athletic and occupational activities result in predictable injury patterns. Imaging in general and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, in particular, are vital in establishing the correct diagnosis and excluding common mimicking conditions, to ensure timely and appropriate management. In this review, the utility of MR imaging and MR arthrography will be explored in evaluation of shoulder disease, taking into account normal variants of the labroligamentous complex. Subsequently, broad categories of labral lesions and instability, external and internal impingement, as well as nerve entrapment syndromes, will be discussed, while emphasizing their imaging findings in the clinical context and illustrating key features. More recent concepts of internal impingement and secondary subacromial impingement will also be clarified.
“…Waldt et al found that 86% of patients with acute anterior instability had arthroscopically proven Bankart lesions (46). Evidence supports arthroscopic surgical intervention for Bankart lesions in patients with traumatic, unidirectional instability and Bankart lesion often requiring surgery, as there is a substantial reduction in rate of recurrence with stabiliza-tion (47). CT assessment of bone stock should be considered when the Bankart fragment involves more than 25% of the glenoid face, given the likelihood of open repair and surgical bone grafting in this cohort (48).…”
Shoulder disease is common in the athletic population and may arise as a consequence of a single traumatic episode or multiple repeated events. Associated labroligamentous injuries can result in substantial disability. Specific athletic and occupational activities result in predictable injury patterns. Imaging in general and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, in particular, are vital in establishing the correct diagnosis and excluding common mimicking conditions, to ensure timely and appropriate management. In this review, the utility of MR imaging and MR arthrography will be explored in evaluation of shoulder disease, taking into account normal variants of the labroligamentous complex. Subsequently, broad categories of labral lesions and instability, external and internal impingement, as well as nerve entrapment syndromes, will be discussed, while emphasizing their imaging findings in the clinical context and illustrating key features. More recent concepts of internal impingement and secondary subacromial impingement will also be clarified.
“…7,24 Unlike glenohumeral dislocation, which requires a manual reduction, the diagnosis of traumatic anterior glenohumeral subluxation is often more elusive and cannot be objectively documented and quantified with similar accuracy. 27
…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 These classification systems take into account the etiology, direction, and type of instability. 37 The type of instability ranges from subluxation to dislocation.…”
Traumatic anterior glenohumeral subluxations comprise the majority of glenohumeral instability events and are endemic in young athletes. Unlike the definitive complete dislocation event, subluxation events may often be more subtle in presentation and, therefore, may be overlooked by clinicians. Glenohumeral subluxation events are associated with a high rate of labral tears as well as humeral head defects. While less is known of the natural history of these injuries, young athletes are at risk for recurrent instability events if not properly diagnosed and treated. While reports of surgical treatment outcomes isolated to subluxation events are limited, arthroscopic and open Bankart repair have been shown to result in excellent outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to review the etiology and pathoanatomy of traumatic anterior glenohumeral subluxations as well as to review the appropriate evaluation and management of patients with this injury.
Keywords: subluxation; glenohumeral subluxation; shoulder instability; instabilityThe glenohumeral joint has the greatest range of motion of any joint in the body, leaving it susceptible to instability, particularly during extremes in ranges of motion, such as those encountered among contact athletes.24 Glenohumeral instability comprises a spectrum of injuries that range from atraumatic subluxations to traumatic dislocations. Although glenohumeral subluxation accounts for the majority of shoulder instability events, studies that have investigated shoulder instability have focused primarily on glenohumeral dislocations. 21,26 Glenohumeral subluxation events are more difficult to investigate because of the challenge of precisely defining and diagnosing these events.
27In 1980, Protzman 29 clearly delineated glenohumeral subluxation as a unique type of shoulder instability that is present in shoulders that have not previously sustained a glenohumeral dislocation event. In 1983, Warren 37 reported on a series of patients with chronic recurrent glenohumeral subluxations who underwent a stabilization procedure. Radiographic evaluation of these patients revealed that 37% of patients had a Hill-Sachs lesion and 50% had a Bankart lesion. In 1983, Mizuno and Hirohata 21 also reported on a series of 55 patients with chronic recurrent anterior glenohumeral subluxations. They reported that radiographs demonstrated a Bankart lesion in 45 of these patients. In 1992, Burkhead and Rockwood 4 reported on a series of patients with traumatic glenohumeral subluxation, and 55% of these patients had radiographic evidence of an osseous Bankart lesion. In 2007, Owens et al 26 demonstrated that 85% of traumatic glenohumeral instability events are glenohumeral subluxations rather than dislocations. These were diagnosed by a history of a traumatic shoulder event combined with physical examination findings of a positive anterior apprehension sign and a symptomatic load shift. Despite long-term knowledge of glenohumeral subluxations and the subsequent studies that demonstrated a high rate of associated gl...
“…In the abducted position (90°), the anteroinferior glenohumeral ligament (AIGHL) provides the main source of resistance to anterior dislocation, while the middle and superior glenohumeral ligaments provide resistance in the mid-abducted (45°) and adducted positions, respectively. The most common mechanism for anteroinferior dislocation is a traumatic event that places the shoulder in extremes of abduction and external rotation [5]. These exaggerated maneuvers result in injuries to the corresponding soft tissues (anteroinferior capsule-labral complex or Bankart lesion) or bony structures (anteroinferior glenoid or posterosuperior humeral head).…”
There is a high rate of recurrent subluxations or dislocations in young patients with history of anterior shoulder dislocation, and recurrent instability will increase likelihood of further damage to the glenohumeral joint. Proper identification and treatment of anterior shoulder instability can dramatically reduce the rate of recurrent dislocation and prevent subsequent complications. Overall, the anterior release or surprise test demonstrates the best sensitivity and specificity for clinically diagnosing anterior shoulder instability, although other tests also have favorable sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, and inter-rater reliabilities. Anterior shoulder instability is a relatively common injury in the young and athletic population. The combination of history and performing apprehension, relocation, release or surprise, anterior load, and anterior drawer exam maneuvers will optimize sensitivity and specificity for accurately diagnosing anterior shoulder instability in clinical practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.