2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Stealing Fire to Cellular Reprogramming: A Scientific History Leading to the 2012 Nobel Prize

Abstract: Cellular reprogramming was recently “crowned” with the award of the Nobel Prize to two of its groundbreaking researchers, Sir John Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka. The recent link between reprogramming and stem cells makes this appear almost a new field of research, but its historical roots have actually spanned more than a century. Here, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2012 is placed in its historical context.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations of the existence of cell fate restriction accompanied the first descriptions of pluripotency itself in the late 19 th century (Lensch and Mummery 2013). Classical embryology experiments involving the division of early newt and sea urchin embryos, in conjunction with subsequent embryonic tissue transplantation experiments by Hans Spemann and Hilde Mangold, were key in demonstrating both the plasticity of early embryonic cells as well as the progressive restriction of their fate as cells progressed through critical stages of development (Lensch and Mummery 2013). Pioneering somatic nuclear transplantation experiments further demonstrated the progressive loss of cell fate plasticity in differentiated cells (Briggs and King 1952; Gurdon 1960; Gurdon 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations of the existence of cell fate restriction accompanied the first descriptions of pluripotency itself in the late 19 th century (Lensch and Mummery 2013). Classical embryology experiments involving the division of early newt and sea urchin embryos, in conjunction with subsequent embryonic tissue transplantation experiments by Hans Spemann and Hilde Mangold, were key in demonstrating both the plasticity of early embryonic cells as well as the progressive restriction of their fate as cells progressed through critical stages of development (Lensch and Mummery 2013). Pioneering somatic nuclear transplantation experiments further demonstrated the progressive loss of cell fate plasticity in differentiated cells (Briggs and King 1952; Gurdon 1960; Gurdon 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments have led to an expansion of experimental approaches to manipulate and modify cells to give them multipotent potential [54]. Several adaptations to this original combination of four factors have been shown to result in pluripotent cells, depending on the starting source of cells used as target [55][58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPSCs were first generated from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblasts following transduction with retroviruses containing four transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc that are normally expressed in ESCs 11 . It was very quickly established that iPSCs could be generated from a variety of adult human cell types 12 . In common with ESCs iPSCs can theoretically be induced to differentiate into any of the 200 or so cell types in the body, and thus like ESCs have the potential to provide an essentially unlimited supply of specific cell types for basic research and transplantation therapies for disease.…”
Section: Future Cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%