2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of manufacturing equipment surfaces contaminated with DDTs and dicofol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for parameters associated with dermal contact (AF and ABS) and ingestion (CSF ingestion and IR) contributed 0.9%-3.4%, while for parameters associated with inhalation (HR and CSF inhalation ) there were almost no contribution. Similar results were also reported by Luo et al (2013), which could be explained by the fact that ingestion and dermal contact were the dominant exposure pathways, parameters associated with these two pathways contributed most to the total uncertainty.…”
Section: Parameters Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, for parameters associated with dermal contact (AF and ABS) and ingestion (CSF ingestion and IR) contributed 0.9%-3.4%, while for parameters associated with inhalation (HR and CSF inhalation ) there were almost no contribution. Similar results were also reported by Luo et al (2013), which could be explained by the fact that ingestion and dermal contact were the dominant exposure pathways, parameters associated with these two pathways contributed most to the total uncertainty.…”
Section: Parameters Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The health risks for different professions may be different. Luo et al (2013) has revealed the great difference of health risk to demolition workers and general industrial workers when exposed to DDTs and dicofol. Secondly, people may be exposed to PAHs via different pathways, and food ingestion has been proved to be one of the most important exposure pathways (Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Parameters Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among industrial workers, micro adjustments of the fit of the EHMR may be permissible owing in part to a lower awareness of risk of self-contamination among industrial workers. [19][20][21][22][23] In the health care setting, with the risk of pathogenic exposure, micro adjustment of the seal is discouraged because touching the respirator may lead to selfcontamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its residues in the environment are persistent, [4][5][6] they can easily cause serious environmental pollution and even pose a threat to organisms in the environment including humans. [7][8][9][10] In recent years, many studies have shown that exposure to DIC in the environment or its residues in foods has severe toxic effects on various mammals and humans, especially on aquatic organisms. [11][12][13][14] To reduce hazards involving food safety and human health, the use of DIC on crops has been strictly limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%