Money matters: does the reimbursement policy for second-generation antipsychotics influence the number of recorded schizophrenia patients and the burden of stigmatization?

Abstract

PurposeIn Poland, non-compliance with the reimbursement policy for second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) manifested in prescribing SGA for patients with psychotic disorders other than schizophrenia may result in serious financial penalties. In this study, we aimed at investigating whether the implementation of the reimbursement policy for SGA contributed to increasing the number of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia relatively to the number of patients with a diagnosis of other psychotic disorders in outpatient clinics.MethodsWe analyzed data from Yearbooks of Mental Health that were published by the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland in the years 1989–2009 registering the number of patients treated for various mental disorders in public facilities in Poland. Temporal trend analysis of the annual number of patients with a diagnosis of psychotic disorders, who were treated at outpatient clinics, was performed.ResultsWe found a statistically significant increase in the total number of recorded schizophrenia patients treated at outpatient clinics, as well as in the number of patients treated for the first time at outpatient clinics for schizophrenia. These changes overlap with the implementation of the reimbursement policy for SGA.ConclusionOur results suggest that the restricted reimbursement policy for SGA altered the diagnosing process in Poland. It seems that these alterations may have serious social consequences. Given that a diagnosis of schizophrenia is more stigmatizing than a diagnosis of other psychotic disorders, it might be assumed that schizophrenia over-diagnosing, possibly due to reimbursement reasons, add to the enormous burden associated with stigmatization.