2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A passive cold storage device economic model to evaluate selected immunization location scenarios

Abstract: Background The challenge of keeping vaccines cold at health posts given the unreliability of power sources in many low- and middle-income countries and the expense and maintenance requirements of solar refrigerators has motivated the development of passive cold storage devices (PCDs), containers that keep vaccines cold without using an active energy source. With different PCDs under development, manufacturers, policymakers and funders need guidance on how varying different PCD characteristics may affect the de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the Arkteks ® PCD was used to deliver vaccines during the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa and in Nepal to assist in the immunization campaign after the 2015 earthquake [ 22 , 23 ]. However, despite their utility, the price of commercially manufactured PCDs is often very high, ranging from US$700 to 3000 per unit [ 15 ]. Some designs require substantial maintenance, for example the Arkteks ® and the Nano-Q ® PCDs whilst able to keep temperatures inside the vaccine compartment at refrigeration temperature for many days, require recharging with ice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the Arkteks ® PCD was used to deliver vaccines during the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa and in Nepal to assist in the immunization campaign after the 2015 earthquake [ 22 , 23 ]. However, despite their utility, the price of commercially manufactured PCDs is often very high, ranging from US$700 to 3000 per unit [ 15 ]. Some designs require substantial maintenance, for example the Arkteks ® and the Nano-Q ® PCDs whilst able to keep temperatures inside the vaccine compartment at refrigeration temperature for many days, require recharging with ice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these refrigerators are costly to purchase and maintain, limiting their use [ 13 ]. Another generation of vaccine storage devices, passive cooling devices (PCDs) [ 14 , 15 ], do not require power (electric, solar or gas) to keep vaccines cool. Rather, PCDs use cooling media such as ice packs or water, and insulation to maintain a cool storage environment [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, computational simulation models helped national, state, and local decision-makers answer questions about whether to close schools, how antiviral medications should be used, and who should get vaccines first when vaccines were in short supply (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Computational models have also helped decision-makers plan new vaccine introductions (26,27), determine how best to design vaccine-carrying devices (28,29), and determine how to redesign health product supply chains (30,31). The use of computational models to directly guide program design in other health areas is relatively new.…”
Section: Ranging Initial Overweight and Obesity Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…on-grid refrigerators, hereafter referred to as “electric refrigerators”) in various settings is important for decision makers to select the most appropriate cold chain equipment for their situation. Computational modeling can help elucidate the potential system-wide implications of changing one or more components in a supply chain prior to deciding whether to invest the resources necessary for implementation [ 8 ]. We used simulation modeling to evaluate the impact of SDDs on vaccine supply chain performance and costs under a range of circumstances and to determine the conditions necessary for solar powered storage equipment to be favorable over ILRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%