2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2109794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

24-Hour Urinary Sodium and Potassium Excretion and Cardiovascular Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(40 reference statements)
3
127
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively these articles express opinions based on flawed evidence without due discussion of the scientific criticisms of the methods and evidence that supports reduction in dietary sodium intake globally [1-3, 4•, 6, 7, 8••, 9, 10•, 11, 12•, 13•, 14]. The articles perpetuate old myths about sodium intake, BP, and CVD (Table 1) and create a controversy based on denial of the merits of the existing scientific consensus, with the lack of acknowledgement of the evidence and the unwillingness to directly address the scientific criticisms of their methods [43,49,50,52,53,55,60,62,67,68,69,[73][74][75][79][80][81][82][83][84].…”
Section: Case Study: the European Heart Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collectively these articles express opinions based on flawed evidence without due discussion of the scientific criticisms of the methods and evidence that supports reduction in dietary sodium intake globally [1-3, 4•, 6, 7, 8••, 9, 10•, 11, 12•, 13•, 14]. The articles perpetuate old myths about sodium intake, BP, and CVD (Table 1) and create a controversy based on denial of the merits of the existing scientific consensus, with the lack of acknowledgement of the evidence and the unwillingness to directly address the scientific criticisms of their methods [43,49,50,52,53,55,60,62,67,68,69,[73][74][75][79][80][81][82][83][84].…”
Section: Case Study: the European Heart Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a small group of scientists continues to publish research based on use of the same flawed methods and without an acknowledgement of the criticisms of their work. This practice of publishing controversial results that are decisively discredited by reputable scientists [68] and scientific authorities [8 ••] is contrary to the norms of science and the expected behavior of scientists. Moreover, continuing to insist upon the validity of the J-curve representation of data, without recognizing and addressing criticisms and making appropriate amendments [69,70] reinforces misperceptions about the benefits and risks of reducing sodium consumption (Table 1) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High sodium intake has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of hypertension and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in an approximately linear dose-response manner [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. For example, a recent meta-analysis of 261,732 participants with 10,150 cases of stroke reported that dietary sodium intake and sodium-to-potassium ratio were positively associated with risk of stroke without evidence of nonlinearity [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that dietary K + modulates blood pressure. The higher the K + ingestion, the lower the blood pressure and vice versa (Mente et al, 2014) (Sacks et al, 2001;Ma et al, 2021). This has been observed in open population and in several potassium supplementation trials.…”
Section: Renal Salt and Potassium Transport In The Distal Nephronmentioning
confidence: 67%