2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sheep colon acellular matrix: Immunohistologic, biomechanical, scanning electron microscopic evaluation and collagen quantification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SEM images exposed the difference of actuation effectiveness between the decellularization solutions, where G3 and G5 samples, using HP, kept the structural appearance on remained pulp (looked like it was corroded continually), while the G2 and G4 samples, exposed to SH, showed a damaged appearance of the pulp, looked like it was frayed [24,25]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM images exposed the difference of actuation effectiveness between the decellularization solutions, where G3 and G5 samples, using HP, kept the structural appearance on remained pulp (looked like it was corroded continually), while the G2 and G4 samples, exposed to SH, showed a damaged appearance of the pulp, looked like it was frayed [24,25]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the tissue‐engineered structures could be used in studies investigating the physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms. Previously, our research group introduced an efficient ovine colon decellularization protocol to produce bio‐compatible scaffolds (Kajbafzadeh et al, 2014). Also, we demonstrated the efficacy of rat colon bio‐scaffolds for bladder muscular wall regeneration (Kajbafzadeh et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, donor deficiency and complications such as portal hypertension, and portal vein embolization have restricted the widespread application of this protocol (Association, ; Pepper et al, ). Tissue engineering, which is a source of obtainable tissues to replace malfunctioning or degenerative tissues (Griffith & Naughton, ), has shown promising results in the regeneration of various tissues such as liver (Baptista et al, ), trachea (Kajbafzadeh et al, ), bladder (Kajbafzadeh et al, ), esophagus (Poghosyan et al, ), small intestine (Belchior et al, ), and colon (Kajbafzadeh et al, ). Tissue engineering appears to be a potential novel alternative therapy for insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus in addition to an immunosuppression‐free state after transplantation, which could alleviate inevitable consequences of conventional therapies for diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, donor deficiency and complications such as portal hypertension, and portal vein embolization have restricted the widespread application of this protocol (Association, 2006;Pepper, Gala-Lopez, Ziff, & Shapiro, 2013). Tissue engineering, which is a source of obtainable tissues to replace malfunctioning or degenerative tissues (Griffith & Naughton, 2002), has shown promising results in the regeneration of various tissues such as liver (Baptista et al, 2011), trachea (Kajbafzadeh et al, 2015), bladder (Kajbafzadeh et al, 2016), esophagus (Poghosyan et al, 2016), small intestine (Belchior, Sogayar, & Grikscheit, 2014), and colon (Kajbafzadeh et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%