Masern-Surveillance in Deutschland

Grüber, Andrea; Mankertz, Annette

doi:10.1007/s00103-013-1787-1

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Vergleich Meldepflichten Und Sentinelerhebungen2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

2016

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Der Vergleich zwischen Meldepflicht nach IfSG und Sentinelerhebungen zeigt [30,31] [31]. Ein von der Meldepflicht unabhängiges Sentinelsystem lässt eine kritische Bewertung der Ergebnisse aus Meldepflichten zu.…”

Section: Vergleich Meldepflichten Und Sentinelerhebungenunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Meldepflichten für Infektionskrankheiten und Infektionserreger in Deutschland: Entwicklung und Verbesserungsvorschläge

Heudorf

Gottschalk

2020

Bundesgesundheitsbl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Vergleich Meldepflichten Und Sentinelerhebungenunclassified

“…Mit sinkenden Fallzahlen verliert ein Sentinel an Sensitivität. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde beispielsweise das Masernsentinel im Jahr 2011 eingestellt [31].…”

Section: Vergleich Meldepflichten Und Sentinelerhebungenunclassified

Meldepflichten für Infektionskrankheiten und Infektionserreger in Deutschland: Entwicklung und Verbesserungsvorschläge

Heudorf

Gottschalk

2020

Bundesgesundheitsbl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Epidemiology and economic burden of measles, mumps, pertussis, and varicella in Germany: a systematic review

Damm

Witte

Wetzka

et al. 2016

Int J Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesDespite the availability of vaccines and the existence of public vaccination recommendations, outbreaks of vaccine-preventable childhood diseases still cause public health debate. The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the current epidemiology and economic burden of measles, mumps, pertussis, and varicella in Germany.MethodsWe systematically reviewed studies published since 2000. The literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE. Also, we used German notification data to give an up-to-date overview of the epidemiology of the four diseases under consideration.ResultsThirty-six studies were included in our review. Results suggest that there is still considerable morbidity due to childhood diseases in Germany. Studies providing cost estimates are scarce. Comparative analyses of different data sources (notification data vs. claims data) revealed a potential underestimation of incidence estimates when using notification data. Furthermore, several studies showed regional differences in incidence of some of the diseases under consideration.ConclusionsOur findings underline the need for improved vaccination and communication strategies targeting all susceptible age and risk groups on a national and local level.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00038-016-0842-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Masern-Surveillance in Deutschland

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Meldepflichten für Infektionskrankheiten und Infektionserreger in Deutschland: Entwicklung und Verbesserungsvorschläge

Meldepflichten für Infektionskrankheiten und Infektionserreger in Deutschland: Entwicklung und Verbesserungsvorschläge

Epidemiology and economic burden of measles, mumps, pertussis, and varicella in Germany: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About