2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of Inpatient Rehabilitation Changes After the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service 2010 Regulatory Updates Contrasted With Actual Performance

Abstract: Comparison with actual data identified that gaps exist between diagnostic category perceptions and actual diagnostic category admission performance. Regulations such as the 75%-60% rule and audit focus on non-neurologic conditions as well as actual inpatient rehabilitation facility program payment reports may have influenced respondents perceptions to change associated with the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual modifications. This disparity between perception and actual data may have implications for programmatic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a large policy update to the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual occurred in 2010, which included updates to the required preadmission screen, multidisciplinary group meetings, and others, previous literature did not find any difference in the types of cases, severity of cases, or outcomes because of this shift. 21 Therefore, the authors are confident that this study's time frame is appropriate for the research question at hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although a large policy update to the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual occurred in 2010, which included updates to the required preadmission screen, multidisciplinary group meetings, and others, previous literature did not find any difference in the types of cases, severity of cases, or outcomes because of this shift. 21 Therefore, the authors are confident that this study's time frame is appropriate for the research question at hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%