2013
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of weight‐ vs body surface area‐based growth hormone dosing for children: implications for response

Abstract: Growth hormone doses can be accurately converted between formats. Surface area-based GH dosing is likely to result in a reduced height response as children become heavier when compared with weight-based GH dosing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context it is noteworthy that surface area based dosing (using m 2 ) as opposed to weight based dosing (using kg) results in relatively higher growth hormone doses in infants and younger children than older children [35]. Whether the dose used in Australia is sufficient to also substantially improve the lean to fat mass ratio in the long term is currently under investigation in our cohort as is the thyroid function and respiratory function.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this context it is noteworthy that surface area based dosing (using m 2 ) as opposed to weight based dosing (using kg) results in relatively higher growth hormone doses in infants and younger children than older children [35]. Whether the dose used in Australia is sufficient to also substantially improve the lean to fat mass ratio in the long term is currently under investigation in our cohort as is the thyroid function and respiratory function.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Differences in dose calculations between the weight-and BSA-based approaches are most prominent at younger ages and with obesity. Hughes et al [90] noted that older children receive a lower total GH dose if BSA dosing is used, rather than weight-based dosing. Rigorous studies comparing weight-based with BSA-based dosing have not been conducted; thus, there is insufficient evidence to recommend one dosing regimen over the other.…”
Section: Dosing Of Gh Treatment For Patients With Ghdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 3 years and 2 months, her height was 80cms (SDS −3.86) (<3 rd percentile on WHO growth chart, <1 st percentile on CDC growth chart) with a height velocity of 5cms/year. GH treatment was commenced at 3 years and 3 months with a starting dose of 4.9 mg/m 2 /week (0.2 mg/kg/week) [7], under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Growth Hormone Program for ‘Short stature and slow growth’ [8]. This category utilises the following auxological parameters on the CDC growth charts; height <1 st percentile on the CDC growth chart and low height velocity (<3 rd percentile CDC growth chart).…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%