2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Raman spectroscopy enables objective diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…98 In an ex vivo study of 673 samples of BE (acquired from 62 patients), endoscopic Raman spectroscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 88% for distinguishing advanced neoplasia (HGD/adenocarcinoma) from LGD, nondysplastic BE and normal squamous oesophagus tissue. 99 BE tissues with various conditions show different optical physiological characteristics which are valuable for discriminant diagnosis. Bergholt et al 100 utilized confocal Raman spectroscopy to detect BE in vivo and recorded a series of peaks that reflected expression levels of different substances (proteins, lipids and porphyrins) in columnarlined epithelium (CLE) and nondysplastic BE and HGD BE, by which they obtained a sensitivity of 87% (67/77) and specificity of 84.7% (610/720) for detecting HGD in BE and AUROCs of 0.88, 0.84 and 0.90 for the discriminations of CLE versus nondysplastic and HGD BE, nondysplastic BE versus CLE and HGD BE and HGD BE versus CLE and nondysplastic BE, and the suspicious BE according to this technique was also confirmed by subsequent biopsy and histopathology.…”
Section: Oesophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…98 In an ex vivo study of 673 samples of BE (acquired from 62 patients), endoscopic Raman spectroscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 88% for distinguishing advanced neoplasia (HGD/adenocarcinoma) from LGD, nondysplastic BE and normal squamous oesophagus tissue. 99 BE tissues with various conditions show different optical physiological characteristics which are valuable for discriminant diagnosis. Bergholt et al 100 utilized confocal Raman spectroscopy to detect BE in vivo and recorded a series of peaks that reflected expression levels of different substances (proteins, lipids and porphyrins) in columnarlined epithelium (CLE) and nondysplastic BE and HGD BE, by which they obtained a sensitivity of 87% (67/77) and specificity of 84.7% (610/720) for detecting HGD in BE and AUROCs of 0.88, 0.84 and 0.90 for the discriminations of CLE versus nondysplastic and HGD BE, nondysplastic BE versus CLE and HGD BE and HGD BE versus CLE and nondysplastic BE, and the suspicious BE according to this technique was also confirmed by subsequent biopsy and histopathology.…”
Section: Oesophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,20 Other modalities, such as fiber-based optical coherence tomography and Raman spectroscopy, could also be used in conjunction to accomplish imaging at multiple resolutions. 33,34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, fiber-optic endoscopic probes have been used in conjunction with Raman spectroscopy for the analysis of esophageal and gastric cancer in vivo and ex vivo [36, 37]. This is a promising tool for intraoperative diagnosis during endoscopic resection of esophageal intramucosal cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%