2013
DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e31829b7dca
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Routine Appendectomy at the Time of Primary Surgery for Mucinous Ovarian Neoplasms Beneficial?

Abstract: Our data suggest that in cases of apparent early-stage mucinous ovarian borderline tumors and cancer, adding an appendectomy at the time of surgery is not warranted in the absence of a grossly abnormal appendix or evidence of metastatic disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the substantial advances in surgery and chemotherapy for ovarian cancer over the last few decades21222324, therapeutic failure and disease progression are still quite frequent25. Searching for novel and validated biomarkers correlated with the clinical and prognostic characteristics of ovarian cancer is important for diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the substantial advances in surgery and chemotherapy for ovarian cancer over the last few decades21222324, therapeutic failure and disease progression are still quite frequent25. Searching for novel and validated biomarkers correlated with the clinical and prognostic characteristics of ovarian cancer is important for diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other groups found only malignant involvement of the appendix in 155 and 36 cases, respectively, when the appendix was grossly abnormal and recommend that only grossly abnormal appendices be removed. 7,8 In a very recent publication of 35 patients with mucinous ovarian cancer, 29 had appendectomy performed. In 21 of the cases, the appendix was macroscopically normal, and histology was normal in 20 cases (95%), and 1 patient had a serrated adenoma.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these patients, 55 were at stage I and 11 patients were at stage III. Fifty-five patients had no pathologic evidence of appendiceal involvement by tumor, as authors could not establish documentation of necessary appendectomy at an early stage of tumor (10). The study of Fontanelli et al on 160 patients with ovarian mucinous tumor undergoing concurrent appendectomy showed that 120 patients were at stage I and stage II without pathologic evidence of appendiceal involvement (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%