2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310291110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturation, not initiation, is the major roadblock during reprogramming toward pluripotency from human fibroblasts

Abstract: Pluripotency can be induced in somatic cells by forced expression of POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 (OCT3/4), sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), myelocytomatosis oncogene (c-MYC) (OSKM). However, factor-mediated direct reprogramming is generally regarded as an inefficient and stochastic event. Contrary to this notion, we herein demonstrate that most human adult dermal fibroblasts initiated the reprogramming process on receiving the OSKM transgenes. Within 7 d, ∼20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
119
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these cells, KLF4 particularly plays important roles for the activation of HERVHs. Our data also revealed that NANOG as a replacer of KLF4 in iPSC generation can induce less HERV-H activity during reprogramming (11). Therefore, the reason why the significant difference of reprogramming activity between KLF4 and NANOG can be explained with our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these cells, KLF4 particularly plays important roles for the activation of HERVHs. Our data also revealed that NANOG as a replacer of KLF4 in iPSC generation can induce less HERV-H activity during reprogramming (11). Therefore, the reason why the significant difference of reprogramming activity between KLF4 and NANOG can be explained with our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…To this end, we examined LTR7 activities during the course of iPSC generation. We sorted TRA-1-60-positive (+) reprogrammed cells on various days after retroviral transduction of OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and myelocytomatosis oncogene (c-MYC) (subsequently referred to as OSKM) and analyzed their global gene expression by microarrays (11,12). Using principle component analyses (PCA) with the 144 DD-iPSC markers, we found similarities between DD-iPSC subclones and TRA-1-60 (+) intermediate reprogrammed cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanabe et al [72] have recently identified the maturation stage of iPS cell reprogramming as being a major bottleneck in the process, which is likely to account for the low efficiency of the process generally. They demonstrate that LIN28, but not NANOG, shp53 or CYCLIN D1, promotes maturation of iPS cells.…”
Section: Maturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only around 1% of cells that initiate reprogramming make it to the stabilisation stage [72] . This can be explained by the observation made by Golipour et al [81] that not all cells are "stabilisation competent".…”
Section: Stabilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouse intermediate reprogrammed cells can be labelled by stagespecific embryonic antigen (SSEA)-1 that is recognized as a specific marker of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs)/iPSCs [5][6][7] . We demonstrated that human cells positive ( þ ) for tumorrelated antigen (TRA)-1-60 8,9 induced by OSKM are intermediate reprogrammed cells to being iPSCs 10 . Behaviour of TRA-1-60 ( þ ) intermediate reprogrammed cells suggested that maturation, but not the initiation step, is a bottleneck of cell fate conversion towards human iPSCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%