2019
DOI: 10.2337/db19-2381-pub
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2381-PUB: Shared Medical Appointments: An Academic-Community Partnership to Improve Metabolic Outcomes among People with Type 2 Diabetes in the Central Valley of California

Abstract: Diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Shared medical appointments are an increasingly popular model to provide access to DSMES and primary care services. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Shared Medical Appointment (SMA) intervention, compared to usual primary care (UPC), for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes over a 6-month period in two rural Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) in the central valley of California. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SMAs are also a clinically effective model for delivery of LM services in primary care, based on their ability to improve outcomes for obesity, cardiovascular risk factors, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and chronic pain. 38,4650 SMAs can improve outcomes and reduce cost in specific populations, but data are limited in primary care settings and further research is required to confidently generalize results these settings. 46,51,52…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMAs are also a clinically effective model for delivery of LM services in primary care, based on their ability to improve outcomes for obesity, cardiovascular risk factors, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and chronic pain. 38,4650 SMAs can improve outcomes and reduce cost in specific populations, but data are limited in primary care settings and further research is required to confidently generalize results these settings. 46,51,52…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%