2014
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e31829f5ebc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Varus or Valgus Malalignment of Proximal Ulnar Fractures on Forearm Rotation

Abstract: Proximal ulna varus and valgus malunions lead to a significant loss of forearm pronation, supination, and total arc of motion. Valgus deformities lead to a loss of supination, whereas varus deformities lead to a greater loss of pronation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, our simulations cannot quantitatively determine the maximal supination based on the resistance of the IOM but can rather assess qualitatively which of its parts predominantly lengthen during the full ROM and afterwards conjecture if it would produce a rotational deficit. As a comparison, a cadaveric study from Snow et al showed predominantly deficits of supination with isolated ulnar valgus deformities of 5° and which led to a substantial resistance when small rotational torques of 27 or 68 Nxcm were applied (maximal supination reached 65.2° and 78.1° respectively) 21 . Based on our results, we can affirm that this deficit of motion may be caused by a lengthening in the DOB (1.8 mm), DOAC (1.7 mm), and POC (1.3 mm) during a supination of 90°, leading to a mean lengthening of the whole IOM of +1 mm (Figures 6 and 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, our simulations cannot quantitatively determine the maximal supination based on the resistance of the IOM but can rather assess qualitatively which of its parts predominantly lengthen during the full ROM and afterwards conjecture if it would produce a rotational deficit. As a comparison, a cadaveric study from Snow et al showed predominantly deficits of supination with isolated ulnar valgus deformities of 5° and which led to a substantial resistance when small rotational torques of 27 or 68 Nxcm were applied (maximal supination reached 65.2° and 78.1° respectively) 21 . Based on our results, we can affirm that this deficit of motion may be caused by a lengthening in the DOB (1.8 mm), DOAC (1.7 mm), and POC (1.3 mm) during a supination of 90°, leading to a mean lengthening of the whole IOM of +1 mm (Figures 6 and 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the routine use of the elbow for work, recreation, and most activities of daily living, operative repair is a clear and obvious solution to these debilitating consequences. 28 Despite the evidence-based need for open reduction and internal fixation when treating proximal ulnar fractures involving the olecranon, 29 these procedures apparently are still thought to be overvalued by the CMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%