2013
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P)

Abstract: BackgroundPatient self-report allows collecting comprehensive data for the purpose of performing economic evaluations. The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility, reliability and a part of the construct validity of a commonly applied questionnaire on healthcare utilization and productivity losses in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P).MethodsData were derived alongside two clinical trials performed in the Netherlands in patients with mental health problems. The response rate, average t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
313
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
313
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our study suffered from a high attrition rate. Comparing the participants who were retained with those who were lost to follow-up and using the 18-month follow-up data to describe both groups showed that those who were later lost to follow-up had less dysfunctional beliefs about their illness, fewer emotional disturbances, better quality of life, and lower symptom levels of general psychopathology, 42 ie, those who were lost appeared to have a better prognosis. So costs might be slightly overestimated and savings slightly underestimated.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, our study suffered from a high attrition rate. Comparing the participants who were retained with those who were lost to follow-up and using the 18-month follow-up data to describe both groups showed that those who were later lost to follow-up had less dysfunctional beliefs about their illness, fewer emotional disturbances, better quality of life, and lower symptom levels of general psychopathology, 42 ie, those who were lost appeared to have a better prognosis. So costs might be slightly overestimated and savings slightly underestimated.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Bouwmans et al found that the agreement between reported data on contacts with psychotherapists and long-term absence from work and registration data was around 70%-75%. 42 Furthermore, we cross-validated 90% of the self-reports with the electronic patient files and found an overestimation of service use in 5% of the cases, which was then corrected. Because 10% of the electronic patient files were not available for inspection, we had to rely on the self-reported health care uptake.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcomes included the following: Work-related outcomes: emotional exhaustion (subscale emotional exhaustion of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, MBI-EE, (44); 5 items; range 1-6; α=0.89), work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, UWES, (45); 9 items; range 0-6; α=0.95), psychological detachment from work (subscale of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire, REQ-PD, (46); 4 items; range 1-5; α=0.92). To assess the number of "work loss" days (absenteeism from work) and the number of "work cutback" days (reduced efficiency at work while feeling ill; presenteeism) we used the respective items of the German Version of the Trimbos and Institute of Medical Technology Assessment Cost Questionnaire for Psychiatry (TiC-P-G) (47).…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter had 100% capture. These data were supplemented with data from a patient self-administered questionnaire, a customized version of the 'Trimbos and iMTA questionnaire on Costs associated with Psychiatric illness' (Tic-P), which has been validated for use in healthcare cost studies [14,15]. An English version of the original Tic-P is available online [16].The questionnaire included questions on stay in a rehabilitation center or nursing facility, number of contacts with the medical specialist and physical therapist, medication and the use of aids (e.g., walker, crutches, and wheelchair).…”
Section: Cost Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%