2013
DOI: 10.1177/0141076813480994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PIP scandal: an analysis of the process of quality control that failed to safeguard women from the health risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been various incidents of (avoidable) health risks for patients in different countries, particularly with regard to women who received breast implants [19,20]. In our investigation period, the number of reports on this kind of scandals almost equalled the number of articles centered on medical progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been various incidents of (avoidable) health risks for patients in different countries, particularly with regard to women who received breast implants [19,20]. In our investigation period, the number of reports on this kind of scandals almost equalled the number of articles centered on medical progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Consequently, statements about the future were mostly formulated as calls for action or change (instead of neutral forecasts). Interestingly, these very critical reports mentioned breast implants much more frequently than other types of implants, which suggests that the recent scandals in plastic surgery have been an important cause of this type of coverage [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The demographic and mobility of women that undergo breast augmentation predisposes them to less than the perfect follow-up and leaves room for a more robust implant registry, superior to the current simple system of voluntary reporting which is susceptible to low-data capture rates [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, however, the manufacturer obtained their CE mark in 1991, but changed the grade of silicone gel in 2001 without notifying the certificate issuer. It is estimated that defective PIP breast implants caused significant harm to over 47,000 women in the UK alone .…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%