2013
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data

Abstract: The benchmark dose (BMD) approach has gained acceptance as a valuable risk assessment tool, but risk assessors still face significant challenges associated with selecting an appropriate BMD/BMDL estimate from the results of a set of acceptable dose-response models. Current approaches do not explicitly address model uncertainty, and there is an existing need to more fully inform health risk assessors in this regard. In this study, a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) BMD estimation method taking model uncertainty i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, the feature will not be considered in the gene-set analysis described below. Note: The US EPA is currently working on methods for model averaging that will obviate the need to select a best-fit model 25 . NTP plans to evaluate model averaging for use in genomic dose-response analysis once the US EPA establishes it as a viable alternative to the best model selection approach.…”
Section: Exponential Model Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the feature will not be considered in the gene-set analysis described below. Note: The US EPA is currently working on methods for model averaging that will obviate the need to select a best-fit model 25 . NTP plans to evaluate model averaging for use in genomic dose-response analysis once the US EPA establishes it as a viable alternative to the best model selection approach.…”
Section: Exponential Model Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, derivation of the BMD tends to be standardized, and model uncertainty may not be a major issue. To develop a model uncertainty technique for ordered categorical data, existing methods for the dichotomous (22,23) and continuous (24) data may be extended, and a similar Bayesian model averaging (25) procedure may be employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian methods have been widely applied in dose-response modeling research. (11)(12)(13) In this study, we propose to characterize the interpopulation variability through the background risk (i.e., relative risk at background exposure) and response sensitivity (i.e., response rate), which corresponds to placing a hierarchical structure over parameters "a" (risk at background exposure) and "b" (a responsesensitivity-equivalent parameter) in Equation (4). The first level of the hierarchy represents the studyspecific estimate and the next level of the hierarchy is a distribution characterizing these parameters.…”
Section: Bayesian Hierarchical Structurementioning
confidence: 99%