2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Differences in Fish Offer Near-Infrared Vision as an Adaptable Evolutionary Trait

Abstract: Near-infrared (NIR) light constitutes an integrated part of solar radiation. The principal ability to sense NIR under laboratory conditions has previously been demonstrated in fish. The availability of NIR in aquatic habitats, and thus its potential use as a cue for distinct behaviors such as orientation and detection of prey, however, depends on physical and environmental parameters. In clear water, blue and green light represents the dominating part of the illumination. In turbid waters, in contrast, the rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore developed an assay to measure changes in swimming behavior in response to light of various wavelengths (Figure 5A-C). When exposed to a directional light source, adult zebrafish display a positive phototactic response (Movies S1 and S2) [32]. We hypothesized that TH-treated wild-type fish would have a stronger phototactic response to near-infrared light than cyp27c1 Δ1/Δ3 mutants due to the vitamin A 2 -induced red-shift in spectral sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore developed an assay to measure changes in swimming behavior in response to light of various wavelengths (Figure 5A-C). When exposed to a directional light source, adult zebrafish display a positive phototactic response (Movies S1 and S2) [32]. We hypothesized that TH-treated wild-type fish would have a stronger phototactic response to near-infrared light than cyp27c1 Δ1/Δ3 mutants due to the vitamin A 2 -induced red-shift in spectral sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, time-lapse frontal microscopy images ( Methods ) ruled this out, since for both upside-up and upside-down embedding the eyes were inclined by an average of about 4 degrees towards the dorsum (3.5±1.0° for the left eye, 4.9±0.8° for the right eye, mean ± s.e.m., S3 Fig ). We also tested the influence of camera and infrared light (840 nm) positions ( S1g, Fig ) – which in either case should have been invisible to the fish (42) – and found that they could indeed not explain the observed differences. As the body-centred preferred location in upside-down embedded fish flipped from slightly dorsal to slightly ventral ( S1j Fig ), and thus remained virtually unchanged in environmental coordinates, optokinetic stimulus location preference appears to be related to the behavioural relevance of these stimulus positions, and cannot merely be caused by retinal feedforward circuitry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also tested the influence of camera and infrared light (840 nm) positions ( S1g-j Fig, S1k-j Fig , Fig. 4) – which in either case should have been invisible to the fish (Shcherbakov et al, 2013) – and found that they could indeed not explain the observed differences. As the body-centred preferred location in upside-down embedded fish flipped from slightly dorsal to slightly ventral ( S1j Fig ), and thus remained virtually unchanged in environmental coordinates, optokinetic stimulus location preference appears to be related to the behavioural relevance of these stimulus positions, and cannot merely be caused by retinal feedforward circuitry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, perception of wavelengths that are not dominant in a specific depth may be useful for the detection of fluorescent light, e.g. for communication, which has been observed in different fish species (Michiels et al, 2008;Shcherbakov et al, 2013Shcherbakov et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%