2014
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0b013e318292f12f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-FDG Uptake in Intraductal Tubulopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas

Abstract: We report a 74-year-old man with intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN), a rare primary intraductal neoplasm of the pancreas. Focal intense uptake of 18F-FDG was seen on the initial PET, corresponding to a pancreatic mass. Although the patient had no treatment, the uptake was mild to moderate on a second PET performed about 1 month later. The tumor was resected, with the final diagnosis of ITPN with an associated invasive carcinoma. Clinicians should be aware that decreased uptake of FDG during the follow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After applying our inclusion criteria, 68 articles were included in the systematic review (Figure S1). 11–78 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After applying our inclusion criteria, 68 articles were included in the systematic review (Figure S1). 11–78 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, intratumoral hemorrhage can cause interval decrease in the metabolic activity and uptake within the tumor. 18 Many of the abovementioned findings are also characteristic of IPMNs, which makes diagnosis by imaging alone nearly impossible. A more solid growth pattern favors ITPN over IPMN.…”
Section: Imaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal intensities of most of these lesions are high on T2WIs and low on T1WIs [ 25 , 26 ], whereas DWI shows diffusion restriction [ 26 , 28 ]. 18F-FDG uptake on PET-CT ranges widely from no to strong uptake [ 29 , 30 ]. Therefore, it was difficult to differentiate our tumor from an ITPN on imaging findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%