2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distant, cis-acting enhancer drives induction of Arf by Tgfβ in the developing eye

Abstract: The Arf tumor suppressor represents one of several genes encoded at the Cdkn2a and Cdkn2b loci in the mouse. Beyond its role blunting the growth of incipient cancer cells, the Arf gene also plays an essential role in development: Its gene product, p19Arf, is induced by Tgfβ2 in the developing eye to dampen proliferative signals from Pdgfrβ, which effect ultimately fosters the vascular remodeling required for normal vision in the mouse. Mechanisms underlying Arf induction by Tgfβ2 are not fully understood. Usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7). Focusing first on TGFb, which guides mouse Arf expression in a process that is required for proper mouse eye development and vision (12)(13)(14), we demonstrate that the signaling pathway, generally conserved between mouse and human cells (43), includes SMAD2/3 and p38MAPK activation as well as SP1 in both species. However, the kinetics of mouse and human ARF mRNA induction and RNAPII binding differ in early-passage MEFs and HeLa cells: Arf is essentially silenced in mouse embryos and early-passage MEFs (13,53) and its induction requires recruitment of RNAPII to the promoter (16), whereas we show here that ongoing ARF transcription in HeLa cells positions them to respond to TGFb without that step.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7). Focusing first on TGFb, which guides mouse Arf expression in a process that is required for proper mouse eye development and vision (12)(13)(14), we demonstrate that the signaling pathway, generally conserved between mouse and human cells (43), includes SMAD2/3 and p38MAPK activation as well as SP1 in both species. However, the kinetics of mouse and human ARF mRNA induction and RNAPII binding differ in early-passage MEFs and HeLa cells: Arf is essentially silenced in mouse embryos and early-passage MEFs (13,53) and its induction requires recruitment of RNAPII to the promoter (16), whereas we show here that ongoing ARF transcription in HeLa cells positions them to respond to TGFb without that step.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Total RNA extraction and cDNA preparation were carried out as described previously (14). Quantitative mRNA analysis was performed using KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems) and the CFX96 Touch System (Bio-Rad) for real-time PCR detection.…”
Section: Quantitative Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…48,49 However, there is no evidence that supports an a priori hypothesis to tie the 9p21.3 locus to these phenotypes. Therefore, our hypothesis was evidence-based to explain the link between the disruption of TEAD binding with the known effect of the 9p21.3 risk locus on p15 and p16 levels and their associated phenotypes of proliferation and senescence [10][11][12]17 Deletion of the 9p21.3 homologous sequence in the mouse is associated with an impaired Smad-dependent response to TGF-β 10,27,39 and with failure of cells to enter senescence. 12 A recent study reported that mice with a deletion of the 9p21.3 homologous region (chr4 Δ70kb/Δ70kb mice) have reduced p15 transcripts in the aorta, with undetectable levels of p16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,37,38 Deletion of the 9p21.3 homologous sequence in the mouse is associated with an impaired Smad-dependent response to TGF-β 10,27,39 indicating that this region contains DNA sequences targeted by SMAD proteins. However, by gel shift, the 2 putative SMAD target sequences disrupted by rs10757275 (data not shown) and rs1333045 ( Figure II in the online-only Data Supplement) did not show differential binding by gel shift assay in response to TGF-β stimulation.…”
Section: P213 Risk Locus Impairs Tgf-β Induction Of P16mentioning
confidence: 99%