2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact pronostique de la localisation urétérale dans les tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor stage and grade were determined by two uropathologists with a central review according to the TNM and grade classification (1973 World Health Organization classification) to include solely initial diagnosis of TaG1 BC. Patients with an upper urinary tract tumor or primary concomitant Cis were excluded [14, 15]. The tumor grade of events that occurred during follow-up was reviewed by two uropathologists (VM, CR) and reclassified using the 2004 WHO classification: G1 and G3 were classified in low and high grade respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor stage and grade were determined by two uropathologists with a central review according to the TNM and grade classification (1973 World Health Organization classification) to include solely initial diagnosis of TaG1 BC. Patients with an upper urinary tract tumor or primary concomitant Cis were excluded [14, 15]. The tumor grade of events that occurred during follow-up was reviewed by two uropathologists (VM, CR) and reclassified using the 2004 WHO classification: G1 and G3 were classified in low and high grade respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%