2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General movements and magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of neuromotor outcome in children born extremely preterm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…41,42 A combination of TEA MR imaging findings and 3-month CA general movement assessment demonstrates improved predictive validity over TEA MR imaging alone, [43][44][45] so evaluation of the relationships between this early MR imaging scoring system and concurrent clinical measures and the combination of early MR imaging and clinical measures to predict later outcomes is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,42 A combination of TEA MR imaging findings and 3-month CA general movement assessment demonstrates improved predictive validity over TEA MR imaging alone, [43][44][45] so evaluation of the relationships between this early MR imaging scoring system and concurrent clinical measures and the combination of early MR imaging and clinical measures to predict later outcomes is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Others have revealed that MRI may provide additive information to predict neuromotor outcomes, 29 complementary to specific findings such as periventricular echodensities by CUS, 30 or neurologic examination. 31,32 Our results suggest that some type of near-term imaging (late CUS or brain MRI) adds value over perinatal/neonatal factors and early CUS alone. Predictive capability as measured by AUC of the ROC was best in models with all neuroimaging, but improvement with the addition of MRI was marginal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Prognostic models based on gestational age, neonatal morbidities and therapeutic interventions like the use of steroids in the neonatal period (4), as well as neurological assessment tools (5,6), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (7) or a combination of these (8,9), may be used to predict outcomes in high-risk infants. A common finding is that accuracy of neurologic assessment increases with age on assessment, delaying interventions beyond the time when brain plasticity is assumed to be at its highest (10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%