2013
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undecidability and opacity of metacognition in animals and humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The arguably best instance involving microbes may be extrapolated from a game scenario called Parrondo's paradox, a set of indeterministic conditions imposing prospective lose-stay winning plays that advance transitions to stable optimal Commentary/Anselme and Güntürkün: How foraging works: Uncertainty magnifies food-seeking motivation ecoevolutionary strategies (Wolf et al 2005). Under such unpredictable homeodynamic and/or ambient constraints, microbes, very similar to taxonomically recent animals, irrationally produce dependable learned/heritable adaptive survival strategies capable of improving and protecting the health and longevity of individuals belonging to extant and future generations, reinforcing provocative notions that universal computational/informational/ physical principles structure expression of irrationality and rationality in foragers, and perhaps predators and cultivators, independently of aneural and neural systems (Bekenstein 2004;Clark 2010a;2010b;Clark & Hassert 2013;Gödel 1931;Ladyman et al 2007).…”
Section: Green and Yuan-fang LImentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The arguably best instance involving microbes may be extrapolated from a game scenario called Parrondo's paradox, a set of indeterministic conditions imposing prospective lose-stay winning plays that advance transitions to stable optimal Commentary/Anselme and Güntürkün: How foraging works: Uncertainty magnifies food-seeking motivation ecoevolutionary strategies (Wolf et al 2005). Under such unpredictable homeodynamic and/or ambient constraints, microbes, very similar to taxonomically recent animals, irrationally produce dependable learned/heritable adaptive survival strategies capable of improving and protecting the health and longevity of individuals belonging to extant and future generations, reinforcing provocative notions that universal computational/informational/ physical principles structure expression of irrationality and rationality in foragers, and perhaps predators and cultivators, independently of aneural and neural systems (Bekenstein 2004;Clark 2010a;2010b;Clark & Hassert 2013;Gödel 1931;Ladyman et al 2007).…”
Section: Green and Yuan-fang LImentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, if intelligence and/or consciousness is expressed at the level of single cells, then multicellularity, whether it be associated with microorganisms, plants, or animals, can be reasonably expected to imbue higher degrees of consciousness in healthy organisms. It should be noted that the phenomenon of consciousness is a hypothetical construct with serious flaws contributing to our less than perfect understanding about its nature in humans (Clark, 2012; Clark and Hassert, 2013). In view of these conditions, we speculate that plant-specific consciousness allows higher plants to behave in an intelligent manner in order to optimize their coping with environmental challenges and diverse stress situations (Trewavas, 2003, 2005, 2009; Trewavas and Baluška, 2011).…”
Section: From Microbial Conscious Cells To Plant Consciousness?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand (explicit metacognition), people are fully conscious of what is occurring in their mind, so as to be able to report about them verbally and regulate their learning strategies according to naive theories, which they share and can describe. On the other hand (implicit metacognition), individuals show that their behaviour is strategically controlled in order to reach the proposed goals, but they fail to consciously perceive how their mind is operating, and thus they fail to report it adequately (Clark and Hassert 2013). Thus, it is conjectured that people acquire a genuinely implicit metacognitive knowledge and they apply it to the task they have to carry out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%