2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuing routine cardiac surveillance in long-term use of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: Is it necessary?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite relatively large cumulative doses of PLD and prolonged use, none of the patients experienced cardio-toxic side-effects as seen with doxorubicin, and our data seem to support that routine cardiac surveillance is not necessary with PLD (9). Therefore, in this group of patients, all of the major goals of treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer were achieved: prolongation of progressionfree interval and improvement in performance status, coupled with manageable toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite relatively large cumulative doses of PLD and prolonged use, none of the patients experienced cardio-toxic side-effects as seen with doxorubicin, and our data seem to support that routine cardiac surveillance is not necessary with PLD (9). Therefore, in this group of patients, all of the major goals of treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer were achieved: prolongation of progressionfree interval and improvement in performance status, coupled with manageable toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Therefore, in this group of patients, all of the major goals of treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer were achieved: prolongation of progressionfree interval and improvement in performance status, coupled with manageable toxicities. Despite relatively large cumulative doses of PLD and prolonged use, none of the patients experienced cardio-toxic side-effects as seen with doxorubicin, and our data seem to support that routine cardiac surveillance is not necessary with PLD (9). The BRCA status of the patients is incomplete and does not allow its influence on response to prolonged PLD treatment to be evaluated (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Anthracyclines are widely used antineoplastic agents for the treatment of both childhood hematological malignancies and solid tumors, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia, non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin's lymphoma, neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing tumors, and nephroblastoma. Almost 60% of children with cancer receive anthracyclines as a part of their treatment [ 1 ]. A major limitation of anthracycline is the risk of cardiotoxicity, manifested as asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction in up to 57% [ 2 , 3 ] and cardiomyopathy with subsequent clinical heart failure in up to 16% [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLD is suspected to have the advantage of low cardiac toxicity. After following 141 patients, Gill et al reported that only one patient had a clinically significant decrease in LVEF at a cumulative dose of 1670 mg/m 2 , suggesting that this routine surveillance of LVEF may not be necessary in the absence of other risk factors [ 24 ]. Similarly, the current study found that there was no significant decline in LVEF after treatment, including patients who had a history of cardiovascular disease or who were treated with anthracycline prior to the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%