The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1111/adb.12045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural activation during processing of aversive faces predicts treatment outcome in alcoholism

Abstract: Neuropsychological studies reported decoding deficits of emotional facial expressions in alcohol-dependent patients, and imaging studies revealed reduced prefrontal and limbic activation during emotional face processing. However, it remains unclear whether this reduced neural activation is mediated by alcohol-associated volume reductions and whether it interacts with treatment outcome. We combined analyses of neural activation during an aversive face-cue-comparison task and local gray matter volumes (GM) using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is emotion discrimination and identification, which differentiated the drinking group from the no/low drinkers. Impairment in emotion detection and expression of greater negative emotional states has been documented using several different paradigms in adult alcoholics in recovery (Charlet et al, 2014; Clark, Oscar-Berman, Shagrin, & Pencina, 2007; Kornreich et al, 2013; Maurage, Campanella, Philippot, Martin, & de Timary, 2008; O’Daly et al, 2012; Schulte, Müller-Oehring, Rohlfing, Sullivan, & Pfefferbaum, 2011). Misperception of emotion has been speculated to contribute to misinterpretation of intent of another person, potentially serving as a source, for example, of argument or unwanted advances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is emotion discrimination and identification, which differentiated the drinking group from the no/low drinkers. Impairment in emotion detection and expression of greater negative emotional states has been documented using several different paradigms in adult alcoholics in recovery (Charlet et al, 2014; Clark, Oscar-Berman, Shagrin, & Pencina, 2007; Kornreich et al, 2013; Maurage, Campanella, Philippot, Martin, & de Timary, 2008; O’Daly et al, 2012; Schulte, Müller-Oehring, Rohlfing, Sullivan, & Pfefferbaum, 2011). Misperception of emotion has been speculated to contribute to misinterpretation of intent of another person, potentially serving as a source, for example, of argument or unwanted advances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After enrolment in the study, patients' alcohol consumption was recorded biweekly for 3 months using the Form 90 for retrospective assessment of alcohol intake (Miller & Del Boca 1994). Here, relapse was defined as a consumption of more than 60 g alcohol for male patients or more than 40 g alcohol for female patients on one occasion (drinking day) during the assessment period (Grüsser et al 2004;Beck et al 2012;DHS 2014;Charlet et al 2014aCharlet et al ,2014b. According to the follow-up data, 16 patients were labeled as abstainers (5 females) and 30 as relapsers (11 females).…”
Section: Subjects/datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic allocation of attention to salient stimuli is guided by a person’s individual goals or needs (Vogt et al 2010) and can be driven by alcohol-related stimulus attributes in ALC (Klein et al 2013; Alba-Ferrara et al 2016) promoting the initiation of alcohol consumption (Weafer and Fillmore 2013) or triggering relapse in abstinent alcoholics (Grüsser et al 2004; Cooney et al 1997). Neural dysregulation of the overlapping emotion and addiction systems together with the difficulty to engage executive control mechanisms can put alcohol-dependent individuals at risk for relapse when cortical–limbic–striatal systems are activated by either alcohol cues (e.g., Courtney et al 2015; Cyders et al 2014) or emotional events (e.g., Charlet et al 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%