2013
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270113003806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-state tautomeric structure and invariom refinement of a novel and potent HIV integrase inhibitor

Abstract: The conformation and tautomeric structure of (Z)-4-[5-(2,6-difluorobenzyl)-1-(2-fluorobenzyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl]-4-hydroxy-2-oxo-N-(2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl)but-3-enamide, C27H22F3N3O5, in the solid state has been resolved by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. The electron distribution in the molecule was evaluated by refinements with invarioms, aspherical scattering factors by the method of Dittrich et al. [Acta Cryst. (2005), A61, 314-320] that are based on the Hansen-Coppens multipole model [Hans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] By using database entries [5] of multipolar parameters computed at ah igh level of theory [6] within the Hansen-Coppensf ormalism [7] for each atom in ag iven covalente nvironment,i tp erforms as fast as IAM [6,8] and provides results that are as informative as those from conventional multipole refinement of high-resolution X-ray diffraction data. [8] Although the invariom approximation is based on pseudo-atomsd erived from isolated molecules andt hus does not take crystal environment into account,i tr eproduces features of covalent bonds with the accuracyo fafull multipole refinement [8][9][10] and gives ar ather adequate description of intermolecular interactions in crystals formed by hydrogen bonds [3,[10][11][12][13] and an even better one for those formed by weak van derW aalsc ontacts. [14] It also has an advantage of providing experimental electron densities (as they are still based on X-ray diffraction data) for systemst hat are not accessible otherwise;t hose of al arger size, [4,15] having poor reflectivep ower, [4,6,12,16] suffering from disorder [15] or twinning, [17] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] By using database entries [5] of multipolar parameters computed at ah igh level of theory [6] within the Hansen-Coppensf ormalism [7] for each atom in ag iven covalente nvironment,i tp erforms as fast as IAM [6,8] and provides results that are as informative as those from conventional multipole refinement of high-resolution X-ray diffraction data. [8] Although the invariom approximation is based on pseudo-atomsd erived from isolated molecules andt hus does not take crystal environment into account,i tr eproduces features of covalent bonds with the accuracyo fafull multipole refinement [8][9][10] and gives ar ather adequate description of intermolecular interactions in crystals formed by hydrogen bonds [3,[10][11][12][13] and an even better one for those formed by weak van derW aalsc ontacts. [14] It also has an advantage of providing experimental electron densities (as they are still based on X-ray diffraction data) for systemst hat are not accessible otherwise;t hose of al arger size, [4,15] having poor reflectivep ower, [4,6,12,16] suffering from disorder [15] or twinning, [17] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although by the definition of invarioms,2 the resulting electron density does not contain the information on crystal packing effects, attempts have been made to use them for examining intermolecular interactions in organic crystals, but in all cases H‐bonds were mostly commented on 4. 12, 15, 19, 20 Their influence on molecular and crystal properties was quantified by the analysis of Hirshfeld surfaces,15, 19, 21 mapping of electrostatic potential (thus revealing important implications for drug research),4, 8, 9, 12, 15, 20, 21 or by topological features within Bader’s “Atoms in Molecules” theory (AIM) 4. 19 The results were encouraging, but still conventional multipole refinement against high‐resolution X‐ray diffraction data is recommended for studying crystal packing effects that are a priori not included in the invariom density 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by NMR correlation spectroscopy and a single-crystal X-ray structure determination. 21 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%