2013
DOI: 10.1160/th12-10-0728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum levels of vitamin D are not associated with future risk of venous thromboembolism

Abstract: Previous studies have provided indirect evidence for a possible association between vitamin D status and risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, no study has so far investigated the association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), the biomarker of vitamin D status, and risk of VTE. The aim of our study was to investigate whether high levels of 25(OH)D were associated with decreased risk of VTE in a prospective population-based study. Serum levels of 25(OH)D were measured in 6,021 men a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Khademvatani et al found a significantly higher prevalence of patients with deficient 25(OH)D in the DVT group compared to the control group [40]. However, the prospective population-based study of Brodin et al found no association between normal serum levels of 25(OH)D and decreased future risk of venous thromboembolism [42]. In addition, a large casecontrol study found that vitamin D supplementation not was associated with a decreased risk of venous thrombosis after extensive statistical adjustments, suggesting a spurious correlation in previous studies [43].…”
Section: Other Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, Khademvatani et al found a significantly higher prevalence of patients with deficient 25(OH)D in the DVT group compared to the control group [40]. However, the prospective population-based study of Brodin et al found no association between normal serum levels of 25(OH)D and decreased future risk of venous thromboembolism [42]. In addition, a large casecontrol study found that vitamin D supplementation not was associated with a decreased risk of venous thrombosis after extensive statistical adjustments, suggesting a spurious correlation in previous studies [43].…”
Section: Other Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Multiple studies have provided indirect evidence for an inverse association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and the predisposition to venous thromboembolism and other atherothrombotic diseases [ 34 ]. However, recent studies suggest that vitamin D deficiency does not play an important role in the pathogenesis of venous thrombosis [ 35 , 36 ]. Though, both the Tromsø and ARIC studies still maintain some doubts [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies suggest that vitamin D deficiency does not play an important role in the pathogenesis of venous thrombosis [ 35 , 36 ]. Though, both the Tromsø and ARIC studies still maintain some doubts [ 35 , 36 ]. Additionally, supplementation with vitamin D seems to play a negligible effect, if any, on the risk of thrombosis [ 37 ], although some results, such as the reduced risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolisms in women randomized to calcium and vitamin D supplementation warrants further investigations [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Moreover, these authors also indicated that the findings of their study revealed the critical role played by 25(OH)D in the pathogenesis of deep vein thrombosis. On the other hand, the Tromsø Study examined whether high 25(OH)D levels were related to decreased risk of VTE in a prospective population-based study with 6,021 participants.The study revealed that serum vitamin D level was not related to future risk of deep vein thrombosis 24.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%