2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of deep and shallow tissue layers' contribution to fNIRS signal using multi-distance optodes and independent component analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
147
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
5
147
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To remove or isolate this global artifact, most methods have used temporal information, and often the temporal values of the short-distance measurement channel as a reference of superficial hemodynamic fluctuations for regression [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, the inhomogeneity of the temporal patterns in the hemodynamic change of the superficial layers [16,17] or the temporal correlation between the hemodynamic responses in the scalp and in the cortex [7,8,18] negatively impacts such artifact-removal methods based on temporal information. In this study, by contrast, the spatial information of the optical paths of all observation channels, which are not affected by temporal inhomogeneity or correlation, is fully exploited for removing the scalp signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remove or isolate this global artifact, most methods have used temporal information, and often the temporal values of the short-distance measurement channel as a reference of superficial hemodynamic fluctuations for regression [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, the inhomogeneity of the temporal patterns in the hemodynamic change of the superficial layers [16,17] or the temporal correlation between the hemodynamic responses in the scalp and in the cortex [7,8,18] negatively impacts such artifact-removal methods based on temporal information. In this study, by contrast, the spatial information of the optical paths of all observation channels, which are not affected by temporal inhomogeneity or correlation, is fully exploited for removing the scalp signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another useful approach is to use ICA in combination with MD measurements as recently shown. [39][40][41][42] Combining the ICA approach with systemic measurements is promising. 43 In a recent study, Kirilina et al 30 proposed a denoising algorithm that uses regressors derived from the time dependency between the fNIRS and systemic signals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6), can be ideally canceled out when k = 1 and The k, however, depends on the optical characteristics of the observed object. Several studies have reported a k value of approximately 1 for a human head [3,4]. In the experiment using the proposed method and phantom, k values of 1.34 ± 0.28 and 1.30 ± 0.33 were obtained at wavelengths of 770 nm and 840 nm, respectively; thus, these did not necessarily indicate the ideal value for removal of motion artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The extraneous baseline changes, referred to as motion artifacts, have troubled users ever since systems became commercially available. Although some useful methods for removing the scalp blood effect from fNIRS signal have been developed in recent years, including multidistance optode arrangement techniques [1][2][3][4] and diffusion optical imaging [5,6], the problem of motion artifacts has been left essentially unsolved. A study using optodes attached on the forehead area reported that multidistance NIRS methods are generally better in reducing movement artifacts than the conventional single distance NIRS [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%